Dr. Anthony Fauci repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment during a contentious Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on Wednesday, declining to answer more than 100 questions about his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The hearing, led by Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, marked Fauci’s latest appearance before Congress. Lawmakers continued investigating the government’s pandemic response, the origins of COVID-19, and National Institutes of Health-funded research connected to China.

Fauci, who was subpoenaed to testify under oath, said he followed his attorney’s advice because he believed the hearing was designed to expose him to potential criminal liability…

A company called Cytonics is attempting to change the biology of osteoarthritis — a $560 billion market where every existing treatment does nothing but manage symptoms while the cartilage keeps deteriorating.

Cytonics discovered that your blood contains a protein designed to protect your joints from the enzymes that destroy cartilage. Your body just doesn't produce enough of it. So they engineered a synthetic version that can be mass-produced.

More than 10,000 patients have been treated with their first-generation therapy. The new version — 200% more potent — just cleared Phase 1 human safety trials with zero adverse events.

If it works, this would be the first disease-modifying osteoarthritis treatment in history. The first one. Ever.*

You can see the full details — and invest — by clicking here.

Although he received a presidential pardon from former President Joe Biden in early 2025, Republicans maintain that he could still face legal consequences for any false statements made under oath during the hearing. Fauci accused Paul of having an ‘obvious obsession’ with prosecuting him and said the senator’s goal was to find grounds to put him ‘behind bars.’

The hearing grew increasingly confrontational as Republicans accused Fauci of misleading Congress about COVID-19’s origins and research funding, while Democratic senators defended him and criticized the proceedings as politically motivated. Sen. Paul later announced the committee would vote next week on whether to hold Fauci in contempt for refusing to answer lawmakers’ questions.

The hearing will shape congressional efforts to hold Fauci accountable for statements made during the pandemic. By invoking the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times, Fauci avoided answers that might expose him to accusations of perjury. But he increased the likelihood of a contempt fight. Sen. Rand Paul said the committee will vote next week on holding him in contempt, although it still remains unclear whether lawmakers will pursue a criminal referral.

The dispute keeps unresolved questions about COVID-19's origins, federal research funding, and government transparency front and center. Republicans believe Fauci misled Congress about NIH-supported coronavirus research in China, although Fauci has denied any wrongdoing and says his testimony has been distorted. Democrats and more than 150 scientists have argued that the investigation is solely politically motivated and was not supported by evidence, although recent headlines appear to contradict that claim.

Should investigators establish that federal health officials withheld information or used unclear definitions when discussing research, skepticism toward agencies like the NIH and CDC could deepen.

It could also influence how Congress oversees taxpayer-funded research, particularly projects involving dangerous pathogens or foreign laboratories. New disclosure rules, tighter grant controls, and stronger reporting requirements could follow as lawmakers examine NIH funding connected to EcoHealth Alliance and coronavirus research in Wuhan.

Congress could use the investigation to justify stricter oversight of federally funded biomedical research, tougher disclosure requirements for grant recipients, and more aggressive scrutiny of government scientists who testify under oath. Pandemic policy remains a contentious issue and is far from settled. Decisions made during the COVID-19 pandemic are still shaping public health policy and scientific research even six years later.

While lawmakers are looking to assign blame for any wrongdoing, the amount of authority federal health officials wield is likely to be reshaped by the end of the hearings.

*Disclaimer: This is a paid advertisement for Cytonics Regulation CF offering. Please read the offering circular at https://invest.cytonics.com. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. There is no guarantee of performance. Past performance does not predict future results. All investments involve risk, including loss of principal.