Newly released excerpts from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s personal diary have sparked renewed scrutiny of his public messaging during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The diary, released by Sen. Rand Paul ahead of Fauci’s scheduled testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, includes a February 2020 entry in which Fauci estimated the virus’s case fatality rate was likely ‘more like 0.2–0.3 percent rather than 2.0 percent.’

He wrote that conversations with former CDC Director Tom Frieden led him to believe the true number of infections was much higher than official case counts, making the virus appear less deadly than early estimates suggested.

The findings contrast with Fauci’s public statements over the following weeks. During television interviews and congressional testimony in March 2020, Fauci repeatedly described COVID-19’s mortality rate as roughly 2% to 3%, while acknowledging it could eventually prove closer to 1% as more mild and asymptomatic infections were identified.

The diary excerpts have fueled accusations that Fauci privately held a significantly lower estimate while publicly presenting a higher figure. Fauci is expected to face questions about the discrepancy during his Senate testimony this week.

Trust during a health emergency depends on officials explaining uncertainty honestly as estimates change. Any discrepancies will be rightfully scrutinized, and Fauci’s diary suggests he privately considered a fatality rate far below the figures he emphasized in interviews and congressional testimony.

Although he acknowledged that the rate could decline as mild and asymptomatic cases were identified, the gap between his private estimate and public messaging raises questions about how risk was presented…

In the 1800s, John D. Rockefeller started refining oil into the world's most valuable fuel. Now, another innovator is creating its own “Rockefeller Moment” with one of the world’s most abundant energy resources: coal.

This is more important than ever right now, because a perfect storm of operational breakthroughs and policy shifts has the potential to directly impact this company’s valuation. 

What’s creating this "Rockefeller Moment” for coal? 

Using their patented FASForm technology, Frontieras can transform coal into high-value commodities like hydrogen, diesel, jet fuel, and fertilizer, without burning it.

They’re targeting a combined $2.1 trillion in markets where demand for these commodities is virtually unlimited. 

Reaching just 2% of the global coal market could mean a trillion-dollar valuation for Frontieras. 

That’s why the "smart money" is already moving. Frontieras has secured a $150M investment commitment from GEM and raised over $30 million from private investors.

But here’s why 2026 is shaping up to be such a historic year for this company:

Become a Frontieras shareholder by August 6 to lock in the $9.01 share price.

Those early mortality claims, boosted by rhetoric from a man in Fauci’s position of power, helped shape fear, government restrictions, school closures, business shutdowns, and contentious debate regarding the appropriate response to the pandemic. If officials highlighted worst-case numbers while privately believing lower estimates were more realistic, the public will want an explanation of who made those decisions and why.

Fauci’s testimony could influence future emergency policy by increasing pressure on agencies to release competing estimates and uncertainties in real time rather than presenting a single figure as settled. The issue is not simply one disputed number, but the credibility of health guidance during moments when Americans are being asked to accept extraordinary restrictions.

The diary’s contents are likely to undermine the public's confidence in federal health guidance. Americans were asked to close businesses, keep children out of classrooms, postpone medical care, and accept limits based on official assessments of the virus’s danger. If questioning shows that officials presented more alarming estimates than they privately considered likely, future warnings may face skepticism even when a threat is genuine.

Public trust in federal health officials has waned since the pandemic, with only half of U.S. adults trusting the CDC’s public health recommendations. To combat this, Congress could respond by requiring health agencies to publish internal estimates, explain disagreements among experts, or disclose the assumptions behind public projections. Such rules would give citizens and local leaders more information before supporting disruptive measures.

*Disclaimer: This is a paid advertisement for Frontieras’s Regulation A offering. Please read the offering circular at https://invest.frontieras.com/ 

Reservation of the ticker symbol is not a guarantee that we will be listed on the NASDAQ.  Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals. 

Under Regulation A+, a company has the ability to change its share price by up to 20%, without requalifying the offering with the SEC.