Opposition to Virginia’s new AR-15 ban is growing just days before the law is scheduled to take effect. According to the Virginia Citizens Defense League, 12 sheriffs and 17 commonwealth’s attorneys have now publicly stated they will not enforce the measure, arguing it violates the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners.

The law, which takes effect on July 1st, bans the sale and transfer of AR-15-style rifles and similar firearms, along with magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds. Resistance has steadily expanded over the past month, beginning with a handful of prosecutors before spreading to sheriffs and elected officials across counties, including Spotsylvania, Clarke, Shenandoah, Powhatan, Hanover, and Warren.

The resistance comes as the law is also being challenged in court. A Virginia judge issued a temporary injunction blocking state police from enforcing the ban while litigation continues. Gun rights organizations argue the law conflicts with both the U.S. and Virginia constitutions, while supporters maintain the restrictions are necessary to improve public safety.

The dispute over Virginia's AR-15 ban is becoming a test of how far states can go in regulating firearms and whether local officials are willing to enforce laws they believe violate the Constitution…

2026 has been the year of the energy shock. But while the world fixated on oil, another strategic resource staged one of the sharpest rallies in commodities: lithium.

Battery grade lithium carbonate has roughly doubled over the past year, to around $20,000 a ton, near three year highs, as supply tightened and demand from EVs, grid storage, and AI data centers surged. Morgan Stanley now forecasts a global lithium deficit in 2026.

EnergyX is positioned right in the middle of it. Its Project Lonestar™ demonstration plant in Texas is now producing battery grade lithium, one of the largest direct lithium extraction facilities in the United States. At full commercial scale, the company projects up to 50,000 tons a year and roughly $1 billion in annual revenue at current market prices.*

Backed by GM, POSCO, Eni, and the DOE. 50,000+ investors. $180M+ raised. Shares are $13 before the July 16 deadline.*

With sheriffs and prosecutors openly refusing to enforce the ban, the fight has moved beyond the state legislature into the courts and local governments. The case is likely to have ripple effects far outside of Virginia, as a ruling against the law could strengthen future challenges to similar firearm restrictions and discourage other states from pursuing comparable bans on commonly owned rifles and magazines.

However, on the contrary, should the law be upheld, it could provide a blueprint for other states that are seeking to expand their own gun control measures. The case is quickly shaping up to be a major battle over Second Amendment rights, with lawmakers and gun rights activists watching closely across the nation.

For now, Virginia gun owners find themselves in an unusual position where enforcement depends as much on their ZIP code as state law. In counties where sheriffs and prosecutors have pledged not to enforce the ban, day-to-day policing could look very different than in neighboring jurisdictions that intend to uphold it. That uneven approach is likely to fuel more legal challenges and leave many firearm owners waiting for the courts to determine which rules ultimately stand.

Legislatures considering bans on AR-15-style rifles and standard-capacity magazines will be watching to see whether the courts uphold the law and whether opposition from local law enforcement gains enough momentum to undermine it. Virginia's legal fight is likely to become a blueprint for other states, with the outcome influencing not only what legislation is introduced next, but how aggressively states try to enforce similar restrictions.

Instead of sweeping federal legislation, the biggest legal battles are increasingly playing out state by state, with each court ruling helping define the limits of the Second Amendment. Virginia's case could become an important precedent, shaping future lawsuits, state firearm restrictions, and the legal standards used to evaluate them for years to come.

*Disclaimer: Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, and “EnergyX” is conducting an offering of securities pursuant to Regulation A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. An offering statement covering this offering has been qualified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Neither this communication nor any of its content constitutes an offer to sell, solicitation of an offer to buy or a recommendation for any of our securities by our company or any third party. Offers and sales of the securities are being made solely by means of the qualified offering circular. Investing in our securities involves significant risks. Before investing, you should consult with your financial advisor, accountant, and/or attorney legal, and carefully review the qualified offering circular (including the “Risk Factors” section) and any offering circular supplements.

The most recent qualified offering circular is available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1830166/000149315226017123/form253g2.htm. The most recent qualified offering circular and any supplements can also be found on the SEC’s EDGAR filing database, available at www.sec.gov/edgar/search/. Prospective investors should note that neither the SEC nor any federal or state securities commission or regulatory authority has approved or recommended our securities or determined that our offering circular is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful. We are not a broker-dealer or investment adviser registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. No communication made by us or any of our affiliates, through this communication or any other medium, should be construed as a recommendation to purchase, sell, or hold any securities, or as investment, tax, financial, accounting, legal, regulatory, or compliance advice. Neither this communication nor any of its content constitutes an offer to sell, solicitation of an offer to buy or a recommendation for any of our securities by our company or any third party. The content presented here is provided for general information purposes only and is not intended to solicit the purchase of securities or to be used as investment, legal or tax advice. Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements The information presented herein may include forward-looking statements, estimates, or projections regarding our anticipated future performance. If present, these statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may”, “might”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “future” or “continue”, the negative of these terms, and other comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements are based on current plans, estimates and expectations and are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, estimates and projections, if any, are based upon various assumptions made concerning our anticipated results and industry trends, which may or may not occur. We are not making any representations as to the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements, estimates or projections. Our actual performance may be materially different from any such statements, estimates or projections. We are under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements to conform them to actual results or revised expectations.