- Shortlysts
- Posts
- U.S.-Canada Trade Dispute Putting $1.5 Trillion North American Deal at Risk
U.S.-Canada Trade Dispute Putting $1.5 Trillion North American Deal at Risk
Trade tensions threaten North America’s economic system, putting supply chains, prices, and jobs at risk as a key agreement nears collapse.

What Happened?
The United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) is under its most serious strain since it replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement in 2020. What was supposed to be a routine six-year review has turned into a heated standoff between U.S. and Canadian officials, with both sides showing they are willing to dig in rather than compromise quickly.
At the center of the dispute is how the U.S. wants to handle China’s role in North American trade. Washington is pushing to block Chinese goods from entering the U.S. through Canada or Mexico, a move that conflicts with Canada’s recent tariff truce with Beijing. That tension has spilled into trade retaliation, including Canadian provinces pulling U.S. alcohol products from shelves in response to earlier tariffs imposed by the Trump administration.
Negotiations have also taken an unusual turn. Instead of three-way talks, the U.S. has been working separately with Mexico while leaving Canada out. Comments from U.S. officials criticizing Canadian leadership have added to the friction. With a July 1st deadline to decide whether to extend the agreement for another 16 years, the lack of coordinated negotiation raises the risk that the deal fractures rather than continues in its current form.
Why It Matters
Trade in North America operates under a tightly integrated system, built over decades. Cars assembled in the U.S. often include parts that cross the Canadian and Mexican borders multiple times. Midwest refineries depend on Canadian crude while natural gas flows across borders to power homes on the West Coast. However, if USMCA weakens or collapses altogether, there will be dire effects on supply chains and trade.
Google just lost a $100 billion antitrust case. Here's who benefits.
A federal judge just ruled that Google illegally monopolized the online advertising market.
The DOJ wants a breakup.
If it happens, billions of dollars in digital ad spend will need somewhere new to go.
That's a problem for Google. But it's a tailwind for platforms that already sit between brands and consumers.
Platforms like Mode Mobile.
Mode built a software layer called EarnOS that pays users for everyday phone activity — browsing, music, games, charging. Brands pay Mode for the engagement. Mode shares the revenue with users.
It's a closed loop. And it works without Google's ad infrastructure.
$115M+ in revenue. $11.8M EBITDA in 2025. 490M+ users across 170 countries. Monthly profitability since April 2025.
Deloitte ranked them the #1 fastest-growing software company in North America. 32,481% over three years.
They've reserved $MODE on the Nasdaq.
The ad economy is getting reshuffled. Mode is already positioned on the other side of it.*
Companies would face higher costs at each border crossing, which would compound quickly. Some manufacturers have already warned they could pull lower-cost vehicle models from the U.S. market entirely if trade protections disappear, which would drive up prices and limit availability.
Financial analysts at Jefferies have estimated a 75% probability that the USMCA enters what they call a period of ‘prolonged limbo,’ with annual reviews as opposed to an actual renewal, while estimating only a 10% chance of a clean renewal. Their estimate of a 15% risk of a full withdrawal is low, but not being completely ruled out by investors.
How It Affects You
In scenarios like this, prices don’t jump all at once; they creep. For example, a car is comprised of many parts that cross borders several times, picking up tariffs along the way. By the time it reaches a dealership, all the added prices have been factored in. Cheaper models are usually the first to disappear because their margins cannot absorb added costs.
Refineries in the Midwest process heavy crude from Canada, and if cross-border trade becomes more complicated or expensive, those refineries can’t easily switch suppliers without taking a hit to efficiency or costs. Natural gas flows the same way, crossing borders to meet demand in different regions. If that movement slows or becomes more expensive, the added cost will be passed down in higher fuel prices and utility bills, especially when demand spikes in winter or summer.
If a long-term extension is not agreed upon, and USMCA drifts into a pattern of short-term renewals, companies will be forced to stop thinking in decades and start thinking in quarters.
*Disclaimer: Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com. This is a paid advertisement for Mode Mobile’s Regulation A+ Offering.
Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.
The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.
Mode cumulative revenue includes full year revenue of businesses acquired in 2025.
Mode 2025 EBITDA includes full year EBITDA of businesses acquired in 2025.
