- Shortlysts
- Posts
- Trump to Revive Cold War-Era Plutonium for Nuclear Power Use
Trump to Revive Cold War-Era Plutonium for Nuclear Power Use
Trump plans to offer Cold War plutonium for nuclear energy, reviving debate over safety, cost, and the future of U.S. power.

What Happened
The Trump administration has announced plans to make approximately 20 metric tons of Cold War-era plutonium available to U.S. energy companies for use in nuclear power reactors.
The plutonium was originally set aside for disposal under a non-proliferation agreement with Russia. It will now be offered as a fuel resource, signaling a significant policy shift in how the U.S. handles its nuclear material stockpile.
Energy companies would be responsible for the processing, transportation, and conversion of the plutonium into a usable form, most likely mixed oxide (MOX) fuel. The material itself would be made available at little or no cost. According to the administration, the goal is to promote domestic nuclear energy, reduce reliance on foreign uranium supplies, and put dormant resources to strategic use.
This move reverses a long-standing disposal strategy. It effectively reopens a debate over nuclear energy policy, waste management, and national security. The U.S.–Russia deal that originally covered this plutonium, aimed at mutual disarmament, has been defunct since 2016 when Russia suspended its participation.
Why It Matters
Nuclear power is reemerging as a key part of the U.S. energy discussion, especially as demand grows for low-carbon energy sources. The decision to repurpose Cold War plutonium taps into that momentum, but it also revives long-standing concerns.
Environmental and nuclear safety advocates have been quick to point out the risks. Plutonium is highly toxic, has a half-life of over 24,000 years, and is notoriously difficult and expensive to handle safely.
You’re feeding AI for free. Why?
The hidden fuel behind AI? Your phone.
You spend hours on your phone — scrolling, searching, tapping…And all that data?
It trains AI systems, improves algorithms, and powers breakthroughs. But who’s getting paid?
Not you.
Not yet.
Mode Mobile figured out how to turn this data flow into cash flow, and they’re rewarding users for the exact same behavior that Big Tech exploits for free.*
They’re building a user-powered data economy that shares the upside and earned the #1 spot on Deloitte’s 2023 list of fastest-growing software companies.
Mode Mobile already has:
● 50M+ users from 170+ countries
● $325M+ earned and saved by users
● 32,481% revenue growth
● Nasdaq ticker secured ($MODE)
All before ever going public.
And now investors can grab pre-IPO shares at just $0.30/share
AI is the future, but your phone’s been the fuel all along.
Now’s your chance to own the pump but not for long as final allocations are disappearing quickly.
Converting it into MOX fuel has already proven problematic. A similar effort launched in the early 2000s was abandoned in 2018 after ballooning to more than $7 billion in cost with little progress to show. Critics believe revisiting this path could lead to more waste, higher taxpayer burdens, and increased safety risks at every stage—from processing and transport to storage.
There are also geopolitical concerns. Using plutonium for civilian energy blurs the line between peaceful and military nuclear capabilities, a distinction long central to non-proliferation efforts.
But proponents of the plan argue the opposite. They believe this move enhances energy independence, recycles existing materials, and strengthens the U.S. nuclear sector without the need for more mining or imports. They also point to advanced reactor designs that may be better suited for handling MOX fuel safely and efficiently.
How It Affects Readers
While this decision won’t have immediate, visible effects on most Americans, it could reshape the country’s long-term energy landscape.
If energy companies take up the offer, some nuclear plants may eventually begin using MOX fuel derived from this Cold War plutonium. That could impact local economies near nuclear facilities, particularly in states like South Carolina and Georgia, where much of the U.S. nuclear infrastructure is based.
Energy policy watchers, environmental groups, and residents near potential transport or processing sites will likely follow this closely. Any mishandling of plutonium could have serious environmental and health consequences. The material’s movement across state lines could spark both legal and political pushback.
Financially, the program’s success or failure could affect federal energy spending. If this turns into another cost overrun disaster like the last MOX project, taxpayers will be left holding the bag again. But if companies successfully integrate the fuel into their operations, it may offer a path to revitalizing the nuclear sector without new uranium development.
The decision to revive Cold War-era plutonium points to a deeper change in how the U.S. is approaching nuclear energy under the current administration. What happens next depends on whether the industry can deliver on safety, cost, and public trust—or whether the idea collapses under its own weight.
*Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.
The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.
Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com.