Trump Rolls Back EV Push, Promises Cheaper Cars Through Deregulation

What Happened

Trump administration officials promoted their automotive policy overhaul at the Detroit Auto Show this weekend, announcing the elimination of federal mandates and emissions regulations for electric vehicles.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer made stops at Ford and Stellantis facilities throughout the Midwest, outlining how regulatory changes will impact vehicle pricing and consumer choice.

The administration hasn’t wasted any time, as Trump signed legislation ending the $7,500 federal EV tax credit, revoked California’s special authority to set stricter emission standards than federal law, and eliminated manufacturer penalties for missing fuel efficiency benchmarks.

The Department of Transportation released proposed rules in December that would relax fuel economy requirements, while the EPA prepares to finalize the rollback of tailpipe emissions standards in the coming weeks.

Secretary Duffy emphasized market freedom over government directives, arguing consumers should choose their vehicles based on personal needs rather than regulatory pressure. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) projects that these changes could reduce average new-vehicle costs by approximately $930. 

 Why It Matters

Rising prices have pushed buyers toward used cars, where limited inventory has raised costs, while previous rules forced automakers to boost EV production regardless of demand.

Manufacturers faced three options under the old rules: sell electric vehicles at a loss to meet emissions averages, raise prices on traditional vehicles to offset EV losses, or pay substantial federal penalties. Each approach led to higher costs passed on to consumers. The new policy removes this regulatory burden, allowing companies to allocate resources based on actual market demand rather than federal mandates.

The Surging AI Everyone Wants In On

$60M+ raised. 14,000+ investors. Valuation up 5,000%+ in 4 years*. Shares still only $0.85.

Backed by Adobe and insiders from Google, Meta, and Amazon, RAD Intel has its Nasdaq ticker ($RADI) reserved and a leadership team with $9 Billion+ in M&A transactions under their belt.

A who’s-who roster of Fortune 1000 clients and agency partners are already using their award-winning AI platform with recurring seven-figure partnerships in place.

Spotlighted in Fast Company, RAD Intel was described in a sponsored feature as “a groundbreaking step for the Creator Economy". Lots to like here; sales contracts have doubed in 2025 vs. 2024. Industry consolidation is exploding — 240 AI deals worth $55B in just six months.

Join early, diversify, and participate in RAD Intel’s upside today.

Own the layer everyone will build on.

👉 Invest Early -- Shares Just $0.85

Total vehicle sales increased 2.4% in 2025 to 16.2 million units despite the policy transition and new tariffs on imported components. Gas-powered trucks and SUVs continue to dominate consumer preferences, accounting for the majority of purchases. The proposal acknowledges this reality rather than attempting to engineer different outcomes through federal requirements.

The Transportation Department estimates fuel consumption will increase by roughly 100 billion gallons through 2050 under the revised standards, with associated costs to consumers of approximately $185 billion.

Administration officials argue this represents consumer choice in action, as buyers can still purchase fuel-efficient or electric vehicles based on their own calculations of costs and benefits, but federal policy no longer penalizes those who prefer traditional options.

How It Affects You

New-vehicle shoppers will see regulatory savings distributed unevenly across models. Smaller sedans faced disproportionate compliance burdens under emissions rules, potentially positioning them for larger price reductions. Trucks and SUVs, already profitable under previous regulations, may show modest decreases. But the extent to which manufacturers pass savings to consumers versus retaining them as profit margin will vary by company and competitive positioning.

Fuel-economy considerations become economic calculations, as less efficient vehicles will use more gasoline over their lifetimes. The economic trade-off is between paying more up front and incurring higher ongoing expenses, and this assessment is now up to individual buyers rather than a regulatory mandate.

Electric vehicle economics shifted substantially following the elimination of the tax credit. The $7,500 federal rebate previously narrowed the purchase price gap between electric and conventional vehicles.

Now, buyers must weigh higher upfront costs against potential savings from lower fuel and maintenance expenses over time. These trade-offs depend heavily on local electricity prices, charging infrastructure availability, and individual driving habits.

*Disclaimer: This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel made pursuant to Regulation A+ offering and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The valuation is set by the Company and there is currently no public market for the Company's Common Stock. Nasdaq ticker “RADI” has been reserved by RAD Intel and any potential listing is subject to future regulatory approval and market conditions. Brand references reflect factual platform use, not endorsement. Investor references reflect factual individual or institutional participation and do not imply endorsement or sponsorship by the referenced companies. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.radintel.ai.