Trump Orders Universities to Expose Admissions Data in Push for Merit-Based Standards

What Happened

President Trump has issued a memo directing all colleges and universities that receive federal funding to submit detailed admissions data to the Department of Education. The required reports must include information on applicants’, admitted students’, and enrolled students’ race, sex, GPA, and standardized test scores.

The directive is designed to enforce compliance with the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision, which ended the use of race as a factor in college admissions. It comes amid growing concerns from the administration and some lawmakers that universities may be skirting the ruling. They may be using indirect proxies for race or implementing alternative "diversity" criteria that produce similar outcomes.

Under the new requirement, schools must turn over the data by a set deadline. After that, federal officials will review the submissions for any signs of discrimination or unlawful practices. Institutions found in violation could face investigations, loss of federal funding, or legal action from the Justice Department.

Why It Matters

Trump's bullish order is an aggressive display of federal efforts to monitor and enforce the Supreme Court’s ban on affirmative action in higher education. While many universities pledged to comply with the 2023 ruling, they faced near immediate backlash and accusations of trying to "work around" the ban. They have emphasized personal essays, socioeconomic background, or geographic diversity in ways that may still favor specific racial groups.

One of Today’s Fastest Growing Company Might Surprise You

Meet $MODE, the disruptor turning phones into income generators.*

Elon Musk said that “universal income will be necessary if AI takes over most human jobs,” and Mode is pioneering privatized UBI powered by technology. Their 3-year 32,481% revenue growth ranked them the #1 software company on Deloitte’s fastest-growing companies list in 2023.

⏰ Pre-IPO almost sold out — invest now at $0.30/share now.

By mandating data disclosure, the administration is seeking tangible evidence to determine whether schools are genuinely complying or simply reshaping admissions criteria to achieve the same racial balancing under different names. For Trump, this is part of the challenge of what he deemed "institutional discrimination against high-achieving students" and to roll back what he sees as politically motivated policies in education.

The order also places universities in a difficult position. Transparency could reassure some, but it may also expose disparities in admissions practices that invite lawsuits. Schools with highly selective admissions may face heightened scrutiny if their numbers suggest patterns inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision.

How It Affects Americans

For prospective students, especially those applying to competitive schools, this policy could influence how applications are evaluated. If universities change course in response to the data review, it may result in a heavier emphasis on measurable academic credentials like GPA and test scores. It may also result in less focus on subjective factors that are harder to quantify.

For taxpayers, the memo shows a greater degree of federal oversight into institutions that rely on public funds. The administration’s stance is that if schools want federal money, they must operate admissions processes that are lawful, transparent, and merit based.

For universities, the stakes are high, both financially and in terms of their reputation. Losing federal funding would be a major blow, particularly for research-heavy institutions or those dependent on federal student aid. Even without penalties, public release or leaks of the data could flare political, legal, and media battles over perceived fairness in admissions.

The new directive intensifies the debate over an already contentious issue. For the Trump administration, it’s both a test of the Supreme Court’s ruling and a challenge to the higher education establishment. For the universities in question, it’s a clear sign that admission decisions will no longer be shielded from federal scrutiny.

*Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.

The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.

Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com.