- Shortlysts
- Posts
- Trump Considers Federal Control of D.C. Amid Crime Concerns
Trump Considers Federal Control of D.C. Amid Crime Concerns
Trump is exploring federal control of Washington, D.C., raising legal questions and political debate as crime statistics show mixed trends.

What Happened
President Trump has revealed he’s considering a federal takeover of Washington, D.C., citing concerns over crime and city management.
Trump claimed that if the federal government ran the capital directly, crime would drop significantly, and operations would improve.
Trump also revealed the White House had already spoken with D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser about it. He said the idea is being seriously considered.
No formal plan has yet been introduced, and Bowser’s office has not confirmed any such discussions. Trump also floated the possibility of applying a similar approach to other cities like New York.
His comments followed the fatal shooting of a Capitol Hill intern, which he pointed to as an example of ongoing public safety issues.
Why It Matters
The District of Columbia has operated under a home rule charter since 1973. This system allows residents to elect local officials and make most decisions independently.
A federal takeover would mark a major change, rolling back local authority and placing key functions of city government under direct federal control.
Crypto's "Once Per Cycle" Wealth-Building Moment Is Here
We’ve entered the next phase of the crypto cycle—where smart capital moves early and retail follows late. With fundamentals stronger than ever and institutional adoption accelerating, the window to act is now. While others wait for certainty, the informed few are positioning for outsized gains.
To implement such a move, Congress would need to pass legislation, since D.C.’s status is established by federal law. There is currently no sign that such legislation is in the works. Also, the idea would likely face opposition from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.
Trump’s comments come as he continues to focus on themes of public safety and government efficiency.
Although legally complex, the proposed idea reflects how Trump is approaching executive power in his current term and what issues he’s prioritizing. Trump has already deployed U.S. Marines and federalized National Guard troops to Los Angeles amid immigration-related protests.
These recent actions demonstrate his willingness to utilize executive authority and federal personnel to directly manage urban issues. This is likely the same logic behind his consideration of federal control over Washington, D.C.
How It Affects Readers
For D.C. residents, a federal takeover would mean changes to policing, education, transportation, and local regulations. It would also raise new questions about representation, as D.C. residents already lack voting representation in Congress.
Outside of D.C., the proposal indicates how Trump may approach urban policy moving forward.
Expanding federal control over city governments would challenge the traditional balance between local and federal authority. This could have implications for other large, Democratic-leaning cities that Trump has frequently criticized.
While the idea remains just that for the time being, it does reflect an ongoing debate about crime, governance, and the limits of federal power.