Trump Administration Begins Dismantling Federal Education Bureaucracy in Major Restructure

What Happened

The Department of Education has signed six interagency agreements to begin transferring several of its major programs to other federal agencies. This marks a major step in the Trump administration’s plan to break up and decentralize the federal education bureaucracy.

These agreements will shift core responsibilities such as K–12 grants, college access initiatives, and workforce training funds to departments like Labor, Health and Human Services, the Interior, and the State Department.

The planned restructuring follows months of internal planning and represents the most significant redistribution of federal education functions in decades. It is part of the Trump administration’s agenda to reduce the Education Department's scope. The goal is to move decision-making power closer to states and local communities.

While some of the department’s most sensitive functions — such as student loans, civil rights enforcement, and special education services — will remain in place for now, officials say this is just the first phase. Additional realignments may follow if Congress allows a full drawdown of the agency.

Why It Matters

The restructuring marks a sharp break from decades of federal centralization in education policy. Since the creation of the Department of Education in 1980, Washington has steadily expanded its role in setting national standards, distributing funds, and overseeing compliance across public schools and universities.

Meet the ChatGPT of Marketing – And It's Still Just $0.81 a Share

It’s easy to see why 10,000+ investors and global giants are in on the action. Their AI software helps major brands pinpoint their perfect audience and predict what content drives action.

The proof is recurring seven-figure contracts with Fortune 1000 brands.

Think Google/Facebook-style targeting, but smarter, faster, and built for the next era of AI. Major brands across entertainment, healthcare, and gaming are already using RAD Intel, and the company has backing from Adobe and insiders from Meta, Google, and Amazon.

Here’s the kicker: RAD Intel is still private—but you can invest right now at just $0.81 per share. They’ve already reserved their Nasdaq ticker, $RADI, and the valuation has soared 4900% in just 4 years*.

This is what getting “in” early feels like. Missed Nvidia? Missed Shopify? This is your second shot. Reg A+ (or Early) shares are still available—but not for long.

👉Shares now open to investors - price changes from $0.81 on Nov 20.

There has been no shortage of criticism under the current system. Many have long argued that this model strips authority from local communities and ties educators’ hands with one-size-fits-all mandates.

By transferring key programs to other departments, the Trump administration is striving to streamline federal operations and return power to the states. Supporters of the planned reshuffling believe that workforce development belongs under the Department of Labor. Public health-related education should go under HHS. Tribal or rural school programs should go under the Department of the Interior.

Many also believe that the change will reduce bureaucracy and improve outcomes by placing education efforts closer to the practical missions of these agencies. In their view, the old model allowed entrenched administrative layers to waste resources, inflate compliance costs, and water down accountability.

Opponents, however, see the move as chaotic and politically motivated. Some education advocates believe that rerouting responsibilities to unfamiliar agencies could lead to confusion, funding gaps, or weakened oversight.

Low-income students, English learners, and those with disabilities could be most affected. They argue the current department, though imperfect, plays a vital role in maintaining equity and consistency across state lines.

How It Affects You

For parents, teachers, and school administrators, these changes will eventually impact how education programs are delivered and who manages the funding. Individual states could gain more say over how to use federal dollars. This may result in more tailored policies or uneven access depending on where you live.

Colleges, especially those serving at-risk or underrepresented students, may have to navigate new channels for grants and completion programs. Likewise, schools participating in federal workforce initiatives could see those programs shift under the Labor Department's control. The department may emphasize job readiness and economic outcomes more directly.

For taxpayers, this represents a stress test of whether decentralization can produce better results. While the Trump administration believes the move will reduce waste and shrink federal control, some fear it may weaken guardrails that protect vulnerable students and create unnecessary confusion as agencies adjust to new responsibilities.

This is a major alteration in how the country chooses to define the federal role in education moving forward. Whether it leads to more freedom and efficiency or more fragmentation and inequality will depend on how well the new system functions once the dust settles.

*Disclaimer: This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel made pursuant to Regulation A+ offering and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The valuation is set by the Company and there is currently no public market for the Company's Common Stock. Nasdaq ticker “RADI” has been reserved by RAD Intel and any potential listing is subject to future regulatory approval and market conditions. Brand references reflect factual platform use, not endorsement. Investor references reflect factual individual or institutional participation and do not imply endorsement or sponsorship by the referenced companies. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.radintel.ai.