The Supreme Court struck down longstanding federal limits on coordinated campaign spending between political parties and their candidates, handing down a ruling that could reshape how congressional races are financed ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, the Court ruled that the restrictions violated the First Amendment by limiting protected political speech.

The decision allows political parties to spend unlimited amounts in coordination with their nominees, giving candidates greater influence over how party resources are used during their campaigns. Writing for the majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh opined that the spending limits unfairly weakened political parties while giving outside organizations, including super PACs, a larger role in federal elections.

Republican leaders quickly celebrated the ruling, calling it a victory for free speech and arguing that it restores power to candidates and political parties rather than to outside groups. Democrats have opposed eliminating the spending limits, warning that doing so could increase the influence of wealthy donors. The ruling is expected to change campaign fundraising and spending strategies as both parties prepare for November’s congressional elections.

The ruling changes how money can flow through federal elections by allowing political parties to work much more closely with their own candidates. Instead of relying heavily on independent groups that cannot legally coordinate with campaigns, parties can now play a larger, more direct role in shaping advertising, messaging, and voter outreach…

The AI boom has created a power crisis. Data centers are devouring electricity, and the solution everyone’s converging on is nuclear, from fusion startups to next generation reactors.

Here’s what most investors don’t know: advanced nuclear runs on enriched lithium isotopes, namely Lithium-6 and Lithium-7, and the U.S. has almost no domestic supply.

EnergyX just launched NUKE-it™, a platform built on its lithium technology to produce nuclear grade lithium isotopes and other strategic materials for fusion and advanced reactors, sitting squarely at the intersection of AI, clean energy, and national security.

It’s the same company already producing battery grade lithium in Texas, backed by GM, POSCO, Eni, and the DOE, with 50,000+ investors and $180M+ raised. One company, three of the biggest themes in the market: lithium, nuclear, and AI.

Shares are $13/share before July 16.*

[Invest at the intersection of lithium, nuclear & AI →]

The timing also makes the decision especially notable. With the 2026 midterm elections approaching, both parties can adjust their fundraising and spending strategies almost immediately, and likely will.

Candidates in competitive House and Senate elections are likely to receive more coordinated financial support from their national party organizations, potentially making campaigns more efficient and more competitive. The ruling is also likely to reduce the influence of some super PACs by giving parties greater control over campaign spending.

The ruling marks another expansion of First Amendment protections in campaign finance, continuing the Supreme Court's long-term trend of limiting the federal government's ability to regulate political spending.

The biggest change for voters won’t be the amount of money in politics, but where that money comes from and how it is spent. National party organizations will now have greater freedom to coordinate directly with candidates, making campaigns more unified and allowing them to respond faster to opponents, breaking news, and changing voter priorities. That could make elections more competitive in closely divided districts where a small advantage in advertising or voter outreach can decide the outcome.

The ruling is also likely to change the messages voters see during campaign season. Rather than outside groups producing much of the political advertising, parties and candidates may take a more prominent role in funding and directing campaign efforts. That means voters could see more coordinated messaging and more resources concentrated on the races most likely to determine control of Congress.

*Disclaimer: Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, and “EnergyX” is conducting an offering of securities pursuant to Regulation A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. An offering statement covering this offering has been qualified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Neither this communication nor any of its content constitutes an offer to sell, solicitation of an offer to buy or a recommendation for any of our securities by our company or any third party. Offers and sales of the securities are being made solely by means of the qualified offering circular. Investing in our securities involves significant risks. Before investing, you should consult with your financial advisor, accountant, and/or attorney legal, and carefully review the qualified offering circular (including the “Risk Factors” section) and any offering circular supplements.

The most recent qualified offering circular is available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1830166/000149315226017123/form253g2.htm. The most recent qualified offering circular and any supplements can also be found on the SEC’s EDGAR filing database, available at www.sec.gov/edgar/search/. Prospective investors should note that neither the SEC nor any federal or state securities commission or regulatory authority has approved or recommended our securities or determined that our offering circular is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful. We are not a broker-dealer or investment adviser registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. No communication made by us or any of our affiliates, through this communication or any other medium, should be construed as a recommendation to purchase, sell, or hold any securities, or as investment, tax, financial, accounting, legal, regulatory, or compliance advice. Neither this communication nor any of its content constitutes an offer to sell, solicitation of an offer to buy or a recommendation for any of our securities by our company or any third party. The content presented here is provided for general information purposes only and is not intended to solicit the purchase of securities or to be used as investment, legal or tax advice. Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements The information presented herein may include forward-looking statements, estimates, or projections regarding our anticipated future performance. If present, these statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may”, “might”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “future” or “continue”, the negative of these terms, and other comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements are based on current plans, estimates and expectations and are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, estimates and projections, if any, are based upon various assumptions made concerning our anticipated results and industry trends, which may or may not occur. We are not making any representations as to the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements, estimates or projections. Our actual performance may be materially different from any such statements, estimates or projections. We are under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements to conform them to actual results or revised expectations.