States Weighing New Congressional Maps Ahead of 2028 Elections

What Happened?

Lawmakers across the country are beginning early discussions about redrawing congressional district maps ahead of the 2028 election cycle. The renewed attention follows a Supreme Court decision that weakened parts of the Voting Rights Act, removing some of the legal constraints that had previously limited how aggressively maps could be adjusted.

In response, both Democratic- and Republican-led states are reassessing their positions. In blue-leaning states like New York, California, and Illinois, officials are considering whether to redraw maps in ways that could increase their party’s share of House seats. At the same time, Republican-controlled states are expected to continue refining their own maps where possible, especially in fast-growing regions.

Redistricting is not a new tactic; it has long been a tool used by both parties, typically following the census every ten years. However, the timing is different this time. Rather than waiting until the next census in 2030, many states are exploring options to redistrict years in advance, in preparation for the 2028 elections.

Why It Matters

The redistricting of congressional maps has major implications for who will control the House in the upcoming midterms, as well as voting outcomes in the 2028 presidential elections. Both parties understand the stakes. The recent Supreme Court decision has changed these efforts.

Google just lost a $100 billion antitrust case. Here's who benefits.

A federal judge just ruled that Google illegally monopolized the online advertising market.

The DOJ wants a breakup.

If it happens, billions of dollars in digital ad spend will need somewhere new to go.

That's a problem for Google. But it's a tailwind for platforms that already sit between brands and consumers.

Platforms like Mode Mobile.

Mode built a software layer called EarnOS that pays users for everyday phone activity — browsing, music, games, charging. Brands pay Mode for the engagement. Mode shares the revenue with users.

It's a closed loop. And it works without Google's ad infrastructure.

$115M+ in revenue. $11.8M EBITDA in 2025. 490M+ users across 170 countries. Monthly profitability since April 2025.

Deloitte ranked them the #1 fastest-growing software company in North America. 32,481% over three years.

They've reserved $MODE on the Nasdaq.

Pre-IPO shares are still $0.50. Up to 20% bonus for early investors.

The ad economy is getting reshuffled. Mode is already positioned on the other side of it.*

Get the details here.

With fewer federal restrictions, states have more freedom to draw maps that push political boundaries. While that does not mean anything goes, it substantially reduces the risk of immediate legal challenges to redistricting efforts.

Public opinion remains a major factor, and the topic of gerrymandering is a complicated one for American voters. While some polls indicate that voters on both sides support redistricting efforts if it helps their side, more recent polls seem to suggest that partisan gerrymandering should not be allowed at all.

Some states have created independent commissions to specifically limit political influence for these issues, but many states do not have these systems in place, which will undoubtedly have an effect on midterms later this year, as well as the upcoming 2028 presidential election.

How It Affects You

Redistricting is a process that can have quiet, but consequential effects on the representative in your district. A line gets moved, your neighborhood is grouped with a different set of voters, and suddenly you’re represented by someone with a different voting record, priorities, and political base.

These changes, which are poised to happen across the country and affect both political parties, change how your concerns are handled in Washington, especially if your area gets absorbed into a district dominated by a larger city or a completely different region.

Election outcomes are also likely to become less competitive. In heavily tilted districts, the general election is often a formality, and the real decision is made in low-turnout primaries, where a smaller, more partisan group of voters has outsized influence. That tends to produce candidates who are less willing to compromise, since their biggest risk is being challenged from within their own party rather than losing to the other side.

Once these maps are finalized, they are rarely revisited until the next cycle, meaning the impact will be longer-lasting. The lines being debated now will decide who represents you, how competitive your elections are, and whether your community’s priorities carry weight or get lost in a larger district. This is a phenomena that quietly shape everything else that follows, and by the time most voters notice the effects, the outcome is already locked in.

*Disclaimer: Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com. This is a paid advertisement for Mode Mobile’s Regulation A+ Offering.

Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.

The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.

Mode cumulative revenue includes full year revenue of businesses acquired in 2025.

Mode 2025 EBITDA includes full year EBITDA of businesses acquired in 2025.