A growing number of states are reducing healthcare benefits available to immigrants as rising costs and tighter budgets are forcing lawmakers to reevaluate spending priorities. Six states so far, including California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina, Washington, and Washington, D.C., have implemented or proposed changes rolling back immigrant healthcare programs.

The reductions come as states face increasing pressure to balance budgets while managing the hefty cost of healthcare programs. Changes to federal funding have added to those challenges, prompting some state governments to reassess who qualifies for coverage and what services will be included.

The adjustments vary by state. California has tightened eligibility requirements, increased premiums, and reduced certain benefits. Colorado has limited some coverage for pregnant migrants and migrant children, while North Carolina has modified its programs to align with updated federal guidelines.

While healthcare policy is always a hot topic, many taxpayers view this issue through the lens of fairness. Americans spend more on healthcare than any other developed nation, exceeding $5 trillion in 2024 alone. Despite the high price tag, millions of Americans still struggle with high insurance premiums, rising deductibles, expensive prescriptions, and medical debt…

Apple just enabled Starlink satellite support to T-Mobile iPhones.

One of the biggest potential winners from global satellite coverage?

Mode Mobile.

Just about everything Elon touches turns to gold:

But while Wall Street focuses on Apple, Mode Mobile is quietly positioned to capitalize on this global satellite revolution.

Their EarnPhone technology already:

And that was before global satellite coverage.

With SpaceX eliminating "dead zones," Mode's earning technology can reach 3B+ unbanked people globally in rural populations worldwide.

We’re talking about emerging markets with no infrastructure.

Right now, you can still invest at $0.52/share.

Over 59,000 shareholders have already claimed their shares and they’ve just secured the $MODE ticker from Nasdaq. The time to invest is now, before any potential IPO.*

Tap into a $1T opportunity — invest now at just $0.52/share and get up to 20% bonus!

Families who work, pay taxes, and follow the law often find themselves asking why they are being asked to help fund healthcare benefits for people who entered or remain in the country illegally, while their own healthcare costs continue to rise astronomically.

That question has become more pressing as states face budget shortfalls and healthcare expenses consume a larger share of public spending. Every dollar allocated to one program is a dollar that cannot be spent elsewhere, forcing lawmakers to make difficult choices.

Critics of these programs argue that taxpayer-funded healthcare should prioritize citizens and legal residents first, especially when many Americans are delaying medical treatment, struggling to afford coverage, or facing high out-of-pocket costs. The debate is not just about immigration or healthcare, but how limited public resources should be used and who should receive the greatest consideration when budgets are stretched.

While federal law generally prohibits illegal immigrants from enrolling in federally funded programs like Medicare and Medicaid, hospitals are still required to provide emergency medical care, regardless of a patient’s ability or inability to pay.

When bills go unpaid, the hospitals themselves absorb the losses, with state governments providing assistance, while the costs are typically passed down to taxpayers and paying patients through higher healthcare costs.

These costs aren’t small, and states are beginning to address the issue. Texas recently began requiring hospitals to track spending on care provided to illegal immigrants and reported that hospitals had incurred more than $1 billion in costs.

Florida implemented a similar reporting system and found that taxpayers were responsible for roughly $566 million in unpaid medical expenses during the program’s first year. Those figures have fueled concerns among lawmakers who argue that already strained healthcare systems should not be expected to absorb such large financial burdens.

*Disclaimer: Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com. This is a paid advertisement for Mode Mobile’s Regulation A+ Offering.

Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.

The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.

Tesla return calculated based on Yahoo Finance adjusted stock price data from June 29, 2010 to January 31, 2025.