Speed vs. Sophistication: America’s Defense Dilemma in the Age of China

What Happened

Senator Tim Sheehy of Montana is pushing for a fundamental overhaul of how the Pentagon buys weapons. The former Navy SEAL argued that America’s procurement system is too slow and too rigid to keep up with China’s industrial scale.

Sheehy’s warning comes from his belief that quality alone does not win wars. He pointed to estimates that China can build naval vessels at a pace roughly 230 times faster than the United States. While American ships and aircraft are often more advanced, he argues that speed and volume could decide a future conflict in the Pacific. One top-tier fighter jet does not mean much, he said in essence, if an adversary can deploy a hundred capable ones.

There is bipartisan agreement that the U.S. military must remain dominant as China expands its naval and missile forces. Policymakers on both sides support strengthening the Navy, modernizing aircraft fleets, and improving readiness. But the disagreement lies in execution, as Sheehy believes acquisition reform is urgent.

His proposal has stirred resistance inside the Pentagon and among defense contractors. Existing procurement processes were developed over decades in response to cost overruns and failed programs.

Companies structure their operations around long-term contracts and detailed requirements. Changing that structure would not be simple. Sheehy, however, says his priority is the 19-year-old Marine who may one day face combat in the Western Pacific, not the bureaucracy that maintains the status quo.

Why It Matters

For decades, American strategy leaned heavily on technological superiority. Stealth aircraft, nuclear-powered carriers, and precision-guided munitions gave U.S. forces a decisive edge. But these systems take years, sometimes decades, to design and field, while also being expensive and produced in limited numbers.

This $1.1B Giant’s Even Bigger Than Previously Thought

In 2023, a GM-backed startup bought mining rights to 100,000+ acres of lithium-rich Chilean land. The buyer, EnergyX, estimated at least 2.6 million tons of lithium sat untapped. Turns out there’s even greater upside.

A third-party study recently verified that the site, dubbed Project Black Giant™, holds at least 4.5M tons and up to 9.8M. Now that the study is complete, EnergyX is preparing for commercial extraction.

Their patented tech extracts up to 3 times more lithium than traditional methods, so they have the means and access to scale Project Black Giant™ to its $1.1B annual revenue potential at projected market prices.

40K+ people have already invested. EnergyX even earned support from the Department of Energy.*

You can join them as an EnergyX shareholder before their share price increases from $11/share after February 26th.

China has emphasized scale, growing into the world’s manufacturing center and applied that capacity to military production. Its ships, missiles, and aircraft may not always match American systems feature-for-feature, but they can be built quickly and in large quantities. In a conflict defined by attrition and long supply lines across the Pacific, replenishment rates could matter as much as raw performance.

Cost overruns, failed programs, and public scandals forced reforms that added layers of oversight and testing. These safeguards are meant to protect taxpayers and ensure troops receive equipment that performs under pressure. Strip them back too aggressively, and the same old problems could resurface.

Adding to the complexity, after years of consolidation, only a small circle of firms can produce the most advanced systems. They operate on long timelines and predictable contracts to sustain skilled labor and specialized facilities. A rapid pivot toward speed and lower costs could disrupt that balance, especially in the near term.

How It Affects You

For taxpayers, acquisition reform could change what defense dollars buy. A renewed system focused on speed and quantity might deliver more platforms at lower unit costs, but likely with fewer advanced features. A system that prioritizes sophistication may produce unmatched capability in smaller numbers.

Regions built around long-term weapons programs might see contracts reshaped or redirected while others could benefit from expanded production lines if speed becomes the new priority. Defense jobs often anchor local economies, so shifts in procurement policy ripple outward.

The real test will be if American institutions can adapt without overcorrecting. Moving too slowly puts them at risk of falling behind a faster, more industrially agile rival; if they change too abruptly, they could undermine systems that still provide real advantages. Finding a steady balance between speed and sophistication may ultimately determine how effectively the U.S. competes with China’s expanding military power.

*Disclaimer: Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc. (“EnergyX”) has engaged Shortlysts to publish this communication in connection with EnergyX’s ongoing Regulation A offering. Shortlysts has been paid in cash and may receive additional compensation. Shortlysts and/or its affiliates do not currently hold securities of EnergyX. This compensation and any current or future ownership interest could create a conflict of interest. Please consider this disclosure alongside EnergyX’s offering materials. EnergyX’s Regulation A offering has been qualified by the SEC. Offers and sales may be made only by means of the qualified offering circular. Before investing, carefully review the offering circular, including the risk factors. The offering circular is available at invest.energyx.com/.