A provision in the Senate’s version of the National Defense Authorization Act would formally authorize the Defense Department to buy ownership stakes in private companies and create a Treasury-managed investment fund to finance those purchases. The proposal would focus on businesses considered vital to national security, including companies involved in critical minerals, batteries, chemicals, and other defense-related industries.

The bill would allow the government to purchase non-voting shares of up to 50% in a company, with individual investments capped at $500 million. The Pentagon has already moved in this direction, investing hundreds of millions of dollars in rare-earth producer MP Materials and rocket motor manufacturer L3Harris Technologies, and acquiring a stake in Intel. Supporters argue that equity investments better align government and private-sector interests while giving taxpayers the opportunity to benefit if those companies succeed.

But the proposal has also sparked controversy, as critics warn that permanent authority to own private companies could expand government influence over the private sector, create conflicts of interest when awarding contracts, and discourage competition by favoring businesses in which the government already holds a financial stake.

The proposal would be a consequential change in how the federal government supports industries tied to national security. Instead of relying primarily on grants, loans, and contracts, the Defense Department could become a shareholder with a direct financial interest in the success of private companies. That vastly changes the relationship between Washington and the businesses that supply everything from rare-earth minerals to rocket motors…

For the first time in history, the U.S. Army is placing a commercial lithium processing facility on military land. They just picked their company to build and operate it.

EnergyX won a conditional lease at Texas’ Red River Army Depot to process lithium. Crucial to next-gen military power systems, the defense sector joins AI, EVs, robotics, and more as drivers of demand for this critical mineral.

The project connects directly to Project Lonestar, EnergyX's flagship Texas operation and the largest lithium demo plant of its kind in the United States.

In total, EnergyX’s project portfolio spans nearly 150,000 acres with up to 15M+ tons of untapped lithium.*

General Motors, POSCO, Eni, and 50,000+ everyday people have already invested. Join them as an EnergyX shareholder before the July 16 investment deadline.

Allowing the Defense Department to buy equity stakes could strengthen domestic supply chains, attract additional private investment, and help the United States compete with countries such as China that heavily subsidize strategic industries. It would also give taxpayers an opportunity to benefit financially when public investments succeed.

However, government ownership could complicate procurement decisions by creating financial interests in the same companies competing for defense contracts. Rival firms are likely to argue that the government is favoring businesses in which it has invested, which is a valid concern. Hesitation around these conflicts of interest and the potential for a larger federal role in determining the success of some companies over others is looming heavily over the proposal.

Congress is deciding on more than whether or not the Pentagon should invest in a few companies. It is deciding whether the federal government should become a long-term shareholder in private industry. Once that authority is established, future administrations could expand it beyond defense into sectors such as energy, technology, pharmaceuticals, or artificial intelligence.

That makes the debate bigger and the stakes higher, as the proposal would establish an entirely new model for how Washington works with the private sector; the government’s role would shift from a customer and regulator to an investor with a strong financial incentive for these companies to perform well.

There are many contingencies here, as it could be a powerful tool for strengthening strategically important industries. However, it could also be the beginning of an uncomfortable level of government influence and power over private enterprise.

*Disclaimer: Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, and “EnergyX” is conducting an offering of securities pursuant to Regulation A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. An offering statement covering this offering has been qualified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Neither this communication nor any of its content constitutes an offer to sell, solicitation of an offer to buy or a recommendation for any of our securities by our company or any third party. Offers and sales of the securities are being made solely by means of the qualified offering circular. Investing in our securities involves significant risks. Before investing, you should consult with your financial advisor, accountant, and/or attorney legal, and carefully review the qualified offering circular (including the “Risk Factors” section) and any offering circular supplements.

The most recent qualified offering circular is available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1830166/000149315226017123/form253g2.htm. The most recent qualified offering circular and any supplements can also be found on the SEC’s EDGAR filing database, available at www.sec.gov/edgar/search/. Prospective investors should note that neither the SEC nor any federal or state securities commission or regulatory authority has approved or recommended our securities or determined that our offering circular is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful. We are not a broker-dealer or investment adviser registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. No communication made by us or any of our affiliates, through this communication or any other medium, should be construed as a recommendation to purchase, sell, or hold any securities, or as investment, tax, financial, accounting, legal, regulatory, or compliance advice. Neither this communication nor any of its content constitutes an offer to sell, solicitation of an offer to buy or a recommendation for any of our securities by our company or any third party. The content presented here is provided for general information purposes only and is not intended to solicit the purchase of securities or to be used as investment, legal or tax advice. Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements The information presented herein may include forward-looking statements, estimates, or projections regarding our anticipated future performance. If present, these statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may”, “might”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “future” or “continue”, the negative of these terms, and other comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements are based on current plans, estimates and expectations and are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, estimates and projections, if any, are based upon various assumptions made concerning our anticipated results and industry trends, which may or may not occur. We are not making any representations as to the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements, estimates or projections. Our actual performance may be materially different from any such statements, estimates or projections. We are under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements to conform them to actual results or revised expectations.