- Shortlysts
- Posts
- Senate Department Shuts Down Biden-Era Anti-Misinformation Office Amid Free Speech Push
Senate Department Shuts Down Biden-Era Anti-Misinformation Office Amid Free Speech Push
State Department ends Biden-era information control program, citing concerns over censorship and aligning with broader push to restore free speech.

What Happened
The U.S. State Department has officially shut down a key part of the Biden administration’s information control framework. It dissolved the Office of Public Diplomacy and ended operations tied to its Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference initiative.
The move finalizes a process started earlier this year under Secretary of State Marco Rubio. He ordered the closure in April. Acting Under Secretary Darren Beattie confirmed this week that all remaining elements of the program have been dismantled. The effort had been housed within the Global Engagement Center, or GEC. The office was originally created to combat foreign propaganda and disinformation.
The framework became the focus of criticism and legal action after reports surfaced that it had collaborated with private “anti-misinformation” organizations such as NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index. These groups had flagged or downgraded content from conservative media outlets. In February 2024, The Daily Wire, The Federalist, and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the State Department. They alleged the government’s involvement in content suppression violated First Amendment protections.
In an internal assessment, the department concluded that the initiative had deviated from its original purpose. In practice, it had operated more as a political censorship tool than as a countermeasure against foreign adversaries.
Why It Matters
This marks a major rollback of a major federal initiative tied to online speech regulation. What began as an effort to counter foreign disinformation during election cycles and global crises evolved into a broader network of partnerships and monitoring tools. Critics argued that many of these targeted domestic speech and specific ideological viewpoints.
Does iPhone 17 prove Elon’s Apple criticism right?
“Apple used to really bring out products that would blow people’s minds.”
-Elon Musk
Elon was right, Apple isn’t innovating, it’s just recycling.
The new iPhone? Thinner. Lighter. Familiar.
It sells.
But specs don’t change unit economics. Benefits do.
So while Apple keeps releasing new versions of the same thing, Mode Mobile innovates.*
Their phones earn real money for users.
A model built on paying the customer, not charging them more.
Traction that actually shows up on a P&L.
Mode’s pre-IPO success is obvious:
● Deloitte’s #1 fastest-growing software company in North America
● 32,481% 3-year revenue growth
● $75M+ in lifetime revenue
● 55,000+ investors already on board
● Nasdaq ticker reserved: $MODE
Mode Mobile has already raised over $52 million.
But you can still get pre-IPO shares with a bonus available for early investors.
Their last round received over $50M in investments and sold out at $0.30/share – don’t miss this one.
By shutting down the program entirely, the State Department is signaling a new posture. It is prioritizing free expression over centralized efforts to shape or filter content. This decision also aligns with recent executive actions aimed at scaling back federal involvement in speech moderation and online information labeling.
The closure also represents a victory for conservative legal and media figures. They had long warned that so-called anti-misinformation programs often blur the line between foreign influence operations and domestic opinion. The lawsuits and investigations surrounding the GEC framework added legal pressure that appears to have played a direct role in its dismantling.
More broadly, the decision reflects a change in how the U.S. government views its role in managing the flow of information. Rather than acting as an arbiter of what constitutes harmful or false speech, the administration is backing away from centralized frameworks. These frameworks carried the risk of overreach or politicization.
How It Affects You
For media outlets, particularly those that felt targeted by these programs, the closure is a major policy win. It reduces the influence of government-linked entities in deciding what counts as credible or acceptable content. This could change how platforms, advertisers, and readers assess media sources in politically charged environments.
For the public, the end of this framework may affect what kinds of information are flagged, removed, or suppressed online. It also raises questions about how the government will respond to foreign information threats going forward, now that one of its key tools for doing so has been retired.
While this may ease concerns about government censorship, it also places more responsibility on individual platforms, journalists, and consumers. They must now navigate the complex space of misinformation, propaganda, and political speech without federal guidance.
*Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.
The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.
In making an investment decision, investors must rely on their own examination of the issuer and the terms of the offering, including the merits and risks involved. Mode Mobile has filed a Form C with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its offering, a copy of which may be obtained here: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1748441/000164117225025402/ex99.pdf