- Shortlysts
- Posts
- SEC Pushing Fewer Reporting Rules to Make Public Markets Attractive Again
SEC Pushing Fewer Reporting Rules to Make Public Markets Attractive Again
The SEC wants fewer rules to boost IPOs, but less reporting and oversight could change how investors access information and manage risk.

What Happened
SEC Chairman Paul Atkins is trying to reverse a long-term decline in the number of publicly traded companies in the United States. He believes that mergers, bankruptcies, and a lack of new listings have steadily reduced the pool, leaving fewer opportunities for investors. His approach is to make going public easier and less expensive, especially for smaller firms that often avoid public markets altogether.
Backed by President Trump, Atkins is leading a regulatory rollback effort at the Securities and Exchange Commission. One of the main proposals under consideration would allow companies to report financial results twice a year instead of quarterly. Companies could still choose quarterly reporting, but the change would give them greater flexibility in line with investor expectations.
The SEC is also exploring a tiered system where smaller and mid-sized companies face fewer compliance requirements than large corporations. Atkins believes that many current rules were designed for bigger firms and impose unnecessary costs on smaller ones. These costs include legal reviews, accounting work, and ongoing reporting obligations that can discourage companies from going public.
The SEC is also stepping back from some recent rules, including requirements tied to climate-related disclosures. Atkins says the agency had become too focused on enforcement and unclear guidance, which created uncertainty. His goal is to replace that with clearer, written rules that define expectations upfront rather than through lawsuits.
Why It Matters
The number of public companies has dropped significantly over the past few decades, leading to a discernible change in how wealth is both created and distributed. When companies stay private longer, most of their growth occurs before everyday investors can buy in, leaving institutional investors and private equity firms to capture a larger share of the upside…
Where AI Meets M&A.
With AI deal flow surpassing $55B in 2025, consolidation is the direction of the market. RAD Intel is scaling inside that shift, and the entry remains early.
In 2021, RAD acquired its core AI engine. Since then, valuation has scaled from $10M to $220M+ (22x), supported by recurring 7-figure Fortune 1000 contracts.
Through its Artificial Intelligence Buyout strategy (AIBO), RAD deploys that same platform across operating businesses to compound value while isolating risk. Leadership has $9B+ in M&A experience. RAD’s momentum is real.
Backed by multiple institutional funds, selected by the Adobe Design Fund, and more than 20K investors, including insiders from Google, Meta, Youtube, and Amazon. The early window won't stay open for long.
*Featured by Nasdaq, Fast Company, Bloomberg, Venture Beat, Forbes, Tech Crunch, Charles Schwab, Cheddar TV, NYSE and NASDAQ.
Regulation plays a big role in that decision. Public companies face constant reporting cycles, legal exposure, and pressure to meet short-term expectations. Business leaders like Warren Buffett and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon have argued that quarterly reporting pushes companies to prioritize immediate results over long-term strategy. Reducing that pressure could make public markets more appealing again.
Additionally, if U.S. regulations are seen as too costly or unclear, companies may choose to list in other countries or stay private entirely. That can move innovation and capital formation away from U.S. markets. Atkins has pointed to past failures, including the collapse of FTX, as examples of what can happen when companies operate outside regulatory frameworks.
How It Affects You
If these changes go through, more companies will likely go public again, especially smaller and mid-sized firms that previously avoided it. That could mean more investment options in retirement accounts and brokerage portfolios, including earlier access to companies that might otherwise stay private for years.
But there’s a trade-off in how much information you get. If companies report less frequently, you’ll have fewer updates on performance, risks, and financial health. That places greater responsibility on individual investors to do their own research and focus on long-term trends rather than reacting to quarterly numbers.
This could also change how companies operate once they go public; with less pressure to hit short-term targets, some may focus more on long-term growth. Although that can be positive, it also means slower feedback when things go wrong. Investors may not see problems as quickly as they would under stricter reporting schedules.
*Disclaimer: This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel made pursuant to Regulation A+ offering and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The valuation is set by the Company and there is currently no public market for the Company's Common Stock. Nasdaq ticker “$RADI” has been reserved by RAD Intel and any potential listing is subject to future regulatory approval and market conditions. Brand references reflect factual platform use, not endorsement. Investor references reflect factual individual or institutional participation and do not imply endorsement or sponsorship by the referenced companies. Some media placements are earned organically, while others may be paid sponsorships or promotional placements. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.RADIntel.ai. Revenue growth reflects unaudited financial information as disclosed in the Company’s offering circular supplement filed with the SEC.