Redrawing Trust: Gabbard’s Purging of 37 Intelligence Clearances

What Happened

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has revoked security clearances for 37 current and former U.S. national security officials, acting under President Trump’s directive.

Among those targeted were individuals involved in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian interference, staffers from prior administrations, and figures connected to Trump’s impeachment inquiry.

Gabbard’s memo, publicly posted on X, blamed these officials for politicizing intelligence, leaking information, and failing to adhere to tradecraft standards. Critics say no specific evidence was provided.

Legal experts, including attorney Mark Zaid, argue that the public release of the list may violate privacy laws and undermine due process. The move has sparked sharp criticism, with many warning of executive overreach and erosion of institutional norms.

Gabbard also announced sweeping reforms within the intelligence apparatus. These included a budget cut exceeding $700 million annually and workforce reductions of about 40% at a key intelligence office.

She framed the cuts as a blow against inefficiency and politicized operations, pledging to realign the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) with its mission of objective, unbiased intelligence gathering, especially in areas like election security and foreign malign influence.

Why it Matters

Security clearances are not just privileges. They come with profound implications for access to sensitive information and the careers of national security professionals.

Removing them en masse, especially for officials associated with earlier administrations or politically sensitive investigations, raises serious concerns about conformity and loyalty tests replacing merit and discretion.

They’ll say they ‘knew about it early.’ You really will.

Everyone loves to say:

“Oh, I knew about that company before it blew up…”

But most people don’t.

So when Mode Mobile potentially goes public, most people will have missed a tech darling that is completely rethinking the $500B smartphone industry, letting users earn and save money simply by using their phones.*

You can still get in, though. But not for long.

The current raise is almost full.

This isn’t just another startup with a shiny pitch deck.

This is:

● 50M+ real users.
● $75M+ in actual revenue.
● Two raises, 100% sold out.
● 50,000+ investors
● 32,481% revenue growth

With Nasdaq ticker ($MODE) secured, investors are eyeing the company’s looming potential IPO.

And now?

This round is open to all investors at just $0.30/share.

So invest now and if you hear someone say they “knew about Mode before it was public” you’ll be able to say:

“Yeah, I invested.”

🚨Round almost full — invest at 0.30/share now.

Detractors argue this sets a dangerous precedent, with intelligence becoming a political weapon rather than a nonpartisan tool.

The chilling message echoed across communities of career civil servants, raising fears that dissent or perceived disloyalty could result in professional destruction. But others view it as a bold effort to strip away entrenched politicization and restore trust to intelligence operations.

The budget and staffing cuts further highlight an initiative to shrink and reorient the intelligence infrastructure. Critics worry this could undermine capabilities just as global threats mount.

How it Affects Readers

A purge such as this heavily influences how national security is approached moving forward. A politicized intelligence apparatus can erode confidence in everything from election integrity to global threat assessments.

When officials fear punitive consequences for their judgments, they may self-censor or manipulate findings to align with political demands. That dilutes accuracy and trust.

The personnel and budget cuts risk slowing response times on emerging threats or weakening intelligence oversight. That may leave gaps in monitoring foreign malign influence, cybersecurity threats, or geopolitical flashpoints that require rapid, expert response.

However, this is also the type of move that many voters may see as refreshing transparency—holding officials accountable and reining in what some view as an entrenched “deep state.” If Gabbard delivers on restoring objective intelligence, it could revamp how citizens view national security agencies and their role in a polarized political era.

Ultimately, this purge signals a new era where loyalty, ideology, and political alignment may increasingly dictate who speaks for U.S. intelligence. It matters not just to Washington insiders, but to every American depending on thoughtful, apolitical defense and foreign-policy guidance.

*Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.

The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.

Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com.