Russian President Vladimir Putin is set to travel to Beijing this week for meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, arriving less than a week after President Trump concluded his own high-profile visit to China. The Kremlin says the timing is coincidental and tied to the 25th anniversary of a friendship treaty signed by Russia and China in 2001. However, the close timing immediately drew attention, given the current political climate.

Over the last several years, Moscow and Beijing have moved closer on military, economic, and diplomatic issues. Their relationship was further elevated in 2022, when both countries described it as a ‘no limits partnership.’

While that phrase attracts headlines, the reality has been more complicated. Russia and China cooperate regularly, but each side still has its own priorities and areas of friction.

A major reason for Putin’s visit is energy, and discussions are expected to include the proposed Power of Siberia 2 pipeline. The project would transport up to 50 billion cubic meters of Russian natural gas annually to China. If Putin is able to finalize details during his trip, deliveries could begin by 2030.

Putin’s visit comes during a time when global alliances are being tested, and several international disputes are unfolding at the same time, including the war in Ukraine and the U.S. conflict with Iran.

China has been closely balancing its relationship with the U.S. against growing ties with Moscow, and experts have increasingly questioned whether Russia and China are long-term partners or merely countries with overlapping interests.

We’re expanding globally to meet the licensing demand for EarnOS by smartphone manufacturers & OEM’s.

75% of our beta users are international, representing a massive and untapped opportunity to scale revenue by serving our existing user base.

Mode Mobile’s goal is to hit $365M in cumulative revenue within two years.*

Invest now at $0.50/share.

Russia lost significant natural gas business in Europe after it invaded Ukraine, giving it stronger incentives to find long-term buyers elsewhere.

China has more leverage in these negotiations, as Russia needs buyers more urgently than China needs energy at the moment.

Concerns surrounding the Strait of Hormuz and its closure have renewed attention on alternative supply routes. A large pipeline running from Russia straight to China offers a strong alternative. It reduces dependence on vulnerable shipping lanes and maritime chokepoints.

Global energy markets are already under strain from the war with Iran and concerns surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, which handles a large share of the world’s oil shipments. If Russia and China move closer to establishing long-term energy deals after Putin’s visit to Beijing, prices will respond accordingly.

Americans felt a version of this after disruptions tied to the Ukraine war, when fuel costs rose, transportation became more expensive, and higher shipping expenses filtered into grocery prices and everyday goods.

If China secures long-term energy agreements with Russia while expanding economic coordination, it strengthens Beijing’s position in future trade and resource disputes, potentially reaching Americans at home.

Reliable energy access helps support manufacturing growth, industrial expansion, and long-term economic planning, particularly in industries where the U.S. and China are already competing aggressively, including semiconductors, batteries, electric vehicles, and AI systems.

If rival countries increasingly lock resources and production into competing economic networks, the subsequent disruptions overseas could create shortages and drive up prices at home. Decisions made in meetings like this can shape which countries hold leverage over the systems Americans rely on every day.

*Disclaimer: Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com. This is a paid advertisement for Mode Mobile’s Regulation A+ Offering.

Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.

Pro forma, includes full year numbers of the businesses acquired in December 2025.