Pentagon Readies 1,500 Troops for Minnesota as Trump Weighs Invoking Insurrection Act

What Happened

The Pentagon ordered approximately 1,500 active-duty soldiers to prepare for possible deployment to Minnesota following weeks of escalating tensions between federal immigration agents and protesters in Minneapolis. Two infantry battalions from the Army’s 11th Airborne Division, based in Alaska and trained for arctic operations, received ‘prepare to deploy’ orders. They remain on standby as President Trump threatens to invoke the Insurrection Act if state officials do not control what he calls professional agitators attacking ICE officers.

The crisis began on January 7th when ICE officer Jonathan Ross fatally shot Renee Good, a 37-year-old American citizen and mother of three, during an immigration operation in south Minneapolis. The shooting sparked protests that have grown into sustained confrontations between demonstrators and roughly 3,000 federal agents deployed across the metro area.

A second shooting on January 14th intensified tensions. An ICE agent shot Venezuelan national Julio Cesar Sosa Celis in the leg during what DHS described as a targeted stop that turned violent after Sosa Celis and two others attacked the officer with a shovel and broom handle.

Trump posted Thursday that he would invoke the Insurrection Act if Minnesota politicians do not stop attacks on ICE agents, blaming Democratic leaders for impeding operations. Trump later walked back the immediate threat. He said there is no reason to use it right now, while making clear he would do so if needed.

Why It Matters

The Insurrection Act allows the president to deploy active duty military forces for domestic law enforcement without congressional approval or state consent. This applies when federal authority is being obstructed or when states request assistance for matters they cannot manage themselves.

The 1807 law has been invoked about 30 times throughout American history. Notable examples include Eisenhower enforcing school desegregation in Little Rock and George H. W. Bush responding to the Los Angeles riots. These instances typically involved situations where local authorities either refused or were unable to maintain order.

The Surging AI Everyone Wants In On

You might call RAD Intel the ROAS King. It powers Fortune 1000 brands and agencies worldwide. Valuation up 5,000%+ in four years*. NASDAQ ticker $RADI reserved. Backed by Adobe and insiders from Google. Recurring seven-figure contracts secured. Sales already 2× in 2025. Shares are just $0.85. Invest in RAD Intel before the next share-price change.

👉 Invest Today at $0.85/Share.

Minnesota presents a unique situation. Roughly 3,000 federal immigration agents are conducting enforcement operations that local officials have openly opposed and refused to support. DHS reports making over 2,000 arrests since early December. Protesters have increasingly interfered with operations, leading to violent confrontations, including attacks on federal officers.

Mayor Jacob Frey has described the federal presence as creating an impossible situation for his 600 municipal officers. Critics argue that local leadership has encouraged resistance rather than worked to keep protests peaceful.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche accused Governor Walz and Mayor Frey of supporting terrorism against federal officers. The administration argued that invoking the Insurrection Act would simply ensure federal agents can perform their duties without being assaulted.

A federal judge issued an injunction Friday restricting certain ICE tactics. The ruling prohibits agents from arresting peaceful protesters or stopping drivers without reasonable suspicion. The administration maintains these restrictions do not apply to legitimate immigration enforcement operations.

How It Affects You

Deploying the military for immigration enforcement would represent the federal government’s most forceful response to what it views as state obstruction of lawful operations. The administration argues this step is necessary to ensure federal law is enforced when state and local governments actively work against it.

Critics see the move as an unprecedented escalation that blurs the line between civilian law enforcement and military action. They warn that this approach could extend beyond immigration into other policy disputes.

The economic fallout would extend beyond protest zones. Businesses near enforcement hot spots face closures and reduced foot traffic, creating short term pain. Enforcement advocates argue this disruption is necessary to address the long-term costs of illegal immigration, including strain on public services and downward pressure on wages.

Investment decisions hinge partly on stability. Whether the federal state clash signals dysfunction or decisive action depends on which outcome is seen as serving the public interest.

Constitutional authority gives presidents broad discretion to deploy military forces when they believe federal law is being obstructed. The Insurrection Act has historically been difficult to challenge in court.

Minnesota officials have promised legal action. Use of the Act would test whether states can effectively nullify federal immigration enforcement through non-cooperation or whether federal authority prevails when different levels of government clash.

*Disclaimer: This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel made pursuant to Regulation A+ offering and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The valuation is set by the Company and there is currently no public market for the Company's Common Stock. Nasdaq ticker “RADI” has been reserved by RAD Intel and any potential listing is subject to future regulatory approval and market conditions. Brand references reflect factual platform use, not endorsement. Investor references reflect factual individual or institutional participation and do not imply endorsement or sponsorship by the referenced companies. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.radintel.ai.