Not a War, Just an Arrest: Rubio Defends the Maduro Raid as Law Enforcement

What Happened 

Delta Force operators raided Maduro’s Caracas residence over the weekend and took the Venezuelan leader into custody alongside his wife, Cilia Flores. The operation was the culmination of months of CIA surveillance inside Venezuela, tracking Maduro’s movements and daily patterns since August. 

Maduro now sits in federal detention in Brooklyn after he was arraigned on Monday in Manhattan federal court. He faced a superseding indictment charging him with narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, and weapons offenses. These were the same charges first filed against him in 2020 during Trump’s first term, only now they were expanded to include his wife.

The indictment paints a damning picture of systematic corruption spanning over 25 years. Prosecutors allege Maduro partnered with Colombian guerrilla groups, Mexican cartels, including the Sinaloa Cartel and the Zetas, and Venezuelan gangs to import thousands of tons of cocaine into the United States.

According to the State Department, between 200 and 250 tons of cocaine flowed through Venezuela annually by 2020. The proceeds allegedly enriched Maduro, his family, and Venezuela’s political elite while funding violent criminal enterprises.

Why It Matters

Rubio’s distinction of the operation as a ‘law enforcement function’ matters tremendously in terms of legal precedent. Military interventions against sovereign nations require congressional authorization under the War Powers Act.

What would you do with an extra $200+?

Here is the reality: You are going to shop on Amazon anyway.

Why not do it with an extra cash bonus in your pocket?

This card offers a welcome bonus worth hundreds to approved Prime members, with absolutely no strings attached.

There is no annual fee, and no special spending requirement to unlock the funds.

It is as close to a no-brainer as it gets.

>> Learn how to unlock this bonus now

However, criminal arrests of international fugitives fall under different legal frameworks that may give the executive branch greater latitude. The administration is betting that courts and the public will accept that a drug kingpin who happens to run a country can be treated like any other trafficker with an outstanding warrant.

But many aren’t buying it. Democratic lawmakers and legal scholars argue that sending special forces into another nation’s capital to extract its head of state looks, walks, and quacks like an act of war, regardless of what you call it.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer termed the operation a reckless violation of the law, while others noted the apparent hypocrisy of pursuing Maduro on drug charges while Trump recently pardoned Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez, who was convicted of smuggling over 400 tons of cocaine into the United States.

Responding to inquiries regarding if this was an act of war or not, Rubio said: ‘There’s not a war. I mean, we are at war against drug trafficking organizations and not a war against Venezuela. We are enforcing American laws with regards to oil sanctions.

We have sanction entities. We go to court, we get a warrant and seize those boats with oil and that will continue, and we will continue to reserve the rights to take strikes against the drug boats that are bringing drugs toward the United States that are being operated by transnational criminal organizations including the cartel.’

Trump has designated multiple drug cartels as terrorist organizations and authorized Navy strikes against suspected drug vessels, killing over 100 people. He's declared fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction and shifted drug interdiction from public health agencies to the military.

Maduro's capture represents the logical endpoint of this militarized approach, as well as a potential template for future operations against other nations the administration deems narco-states.

How It Affects You

The precedents set by this operation will echo far beyond Venezuela's borders. If the executive branch can unilaterally authorize military force to arrest foreign leaders on criminal charges without congressional oversight, future presidents of any party will possess dramatically expanded powers to intervene abroad.

The operation also represents a consequential change in how America engages with the global drug trade. Rather than treating addiction as a public health crisis or targeting domestic distribution networks, this approach emphasizes overseas military action against source countries. Whether that strategy actually reduces drug deaths in American communities remains to be seen, but it certainly expands the likelihood of U.S. military engagement in Latin America and beyond.

Trump has stated the U.S. will temporarily oversee Venezuela and tap its oil reserves, raising questions about American involvement in another nation’s resources. Venezuelan exiles in the U.S. overwhelmingly supported Maduro’s removal, although small pro-Maduro protests occurred in American cities. The operation may encourage the administration to target additional leaders, with GOP lawmakers mentioning Cuba and Nicaragua as possible examples.

For Venezuelan-Americans who fled Maduro’s regime, the capture is seen as bringing justice and hope for their homeland’s future. For constitutional scholars and foreign policy experts, it does pose significant questions about executive power and America’s global role.

Debate will rage in Congress and the courts over the operation’s legality and its precedent-setting implications. But the United States has crossed a threshold not seen since the 1989 Noriega case, raising urgent questions about law enforcement and presidential power that will define the future of American intervention.