U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement highlighted figures estimating that 61% of households headed by illegal immigrants received at least one major welfare benefit, compared with 37% of households headed by U.S.-born Americans.

The figures originate in a Center for Immigration Studies analysis of 2024 Census Bureau data. Researcher Steven Camarota attributed much of the participation to eligible American children living with parents generally barred from federal assistance. Food benefits reached 44% of illegal immigrant households, twice the rate among households headed by native-born Americans. Medicaid participation was also 44%, compared with 27%. Some states extend assistance beyond federal eligibility rules.

Camarota argued that low earnings and limited education help explain participation despite employment, and recommended stronger immigration enforcement and greater emphasis on skills when selecting legal immigrants. He also argued that restricting adults’ eligibility has done relatively little to limit household reliance on assistance.

He recommended tighter enforcement and greater emphasis on education and skills in legal admissions, arguing that an immigration system should select for the ability to support a family, not simply the willingness to work.

A taxpayer-funded welfare system becomes harder to sustain when illegal immigration adds households whose earnings cannot cover basic expenses. The reported participation gap raises a serious question about a policy that promises self-sufficiency while leaving public programs to meet the shortfall…

If Morgan Stanley’s right, the flying car industry will grow 185,850% by 2050. In fact, they say it will reach $9 trillion in size, more than twice as valuable as today’s global car market.* 

And 5,500+ investors believe Doroni will lead the charge. While competitors chase air fleets and taxis, Doroni’s H1-X aircraft is designed for everyday life. It plugs in and charges like an EV, fits in a two-car garage, and requires just 25 hours of training to pilot. 

And while others are peddling blueprints and renderings, Doroni just unveiled a full-scale showroom prototype in March. It was so impressive, FOX Business called it the “‘flying car’ set to revolutionize air travel.”

600+ people have already reserved one, good for $240M in potential revenue for Doroni. And you can claim an early-stage stake in Doroni at $3.30/share today. But hurry. Invest in Doroni before tonight’s 11:59pm ET deadline.

Employment alone offers an inadequate answer, as businesses can benefit from additional workers without bearing the full expense of supporting their households. Food and medical assistance spread part of that expense across taxpayers, including families struggling to cover the same necessities without government help. Cheap labor is less cheap when its costs extend beyond the employer’s payroll.

Although many restrictions target these adults, their children often qualify for assistance and have legal entitlements. However, the resulting expenditure remains a consequence lawmakers must consider when setting immigration policy. Regardless of whether the payment complies with the law, the expense remains.

Checking eligibility cannot resolve a policy that admits or tolerates households unable to support themselves without assistance. These illegal immigration decisions are creating a slew of financial obligations that welfare restrictions alone cannot contain.

Taxpayers have their own obligations in the form of mortgages, medical bills, and retirement savings that leave little room for additional demands, especially in this economy. They are entitled to expect immigration policy to account for the spending it creates, rather than leave the bill scattered across programs and budgets.

While household participation rates cannot tell each reader what illegal immigration costs them personally, they do show why assurances that illegal immigrants are barred from most federal benefits provide an incomplete account of public spending.

Costs can be easy to obscure since they appear in welfare budgets rather than immigration accounts. Food assistance is recorded as food assistance, and Medicaid spending remains Medicaid spending. Yet the obligations persist long after an unlawful entry, leaving taxpayers to support commitments they had little opportunity to weigh.

A government that tolerates illegal immigration is making a spending decision, even when it declines to present one.

*Disclaimer: This is a paid advertisement for Doroni Regulation A offering. Please read the offering circular at https://invest.doroni.io/