Houston Reverses Immigration Policy After Funding Threat

What Happened?

Houston officials voted to roll back a policy that limited cooperation with federal immigration authorities after the state of Texas threatened to pull more than $110 million in public safety funding. The original ordinance prevented local police from holding individuals with immigration warrants while waiting for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to arrive.

Governor Greg Abbott argued the policy violated the terms tied to state grants, which require local agencies to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. In response, the state warned not only of pulling funding but also of forcing repayment of previously distributed funds.

Facing those risks, Houston Mayor John Whitmire worked with state officials to revise the ordinance. The updated version allows police to hold individuals for a ‘reasonable’ period and confirms compliance with federal law. The city council approved the change in a 13–4 vote, effectively reversing course within weeks of passing the original policy.

Why It Matters

This dispute centers on how much control cities have over local policing when state funding is tied to specific enforcement requirements. Texas law requires cooperation with ICE, and the state has made clear it will enforce that condition through financial pressure rather than negotiation.

Google just lost a $100 billion antitrust case. Here's who benefits

A federal judge just ruled that Google illegally monopolized the online advertising market.

The DOJ wants a breakup.

If it happens, billions of dollars in digital ad spend will need somewhere new to go.

That's a problem for Google. But it's a tailwind for platforms that already sit between brands and consumers.

Platforms like Mode Mobile.

Mode built a software layer called EarnOS that pays users for everyday phone activity — browsing, music, games, charging. Brands pay Mode for the engagement. Mode shares the revenue with users.

It's a closed loop. And it works without Google's ad infrastructure.

$115M+ in revenue. $11.8M EBITDA in 2025. 490M+ users across 170 countries. Monthly profitability since April 2025.

Deloitte ranked them the #1 fastest-growing software company in North America. 32,481% over three years.

They've reserved $MODE on the Nasdaq.

Pre-IPO shares are still $0.50. Up to 20% bonus for early investors.*

The ad economy is getting reshuffled. Mode is already positioned on the other side of it.

Get the details here.

The scale of the funding threatened with being pulled was significant, and ultimately could not be ignored, as Houston relies heavily on state money. Losing that support, along with potential cuts to monthly revenue streams, would have created budget gaps large enough to severely affect staffing, infrastructure, and event planning.

The lawsuit filed against the city by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton reinforced the state’s position that local policies cannot and will not restrict immigration enforcement. This combination of legal action and financial leverage left Houston with limited room to maintain its original policy of not cooperating with federal immigration authorities.

How It Affects You

Houston avoided a colossal budget hit by backing down. Keeping that $110 million means keeping the police well-funded, as well as funding staffing and event planning for the city, which will be especially needed in the coming months as Houston hosts seven World Cup matches this summer. It also changes how local officers handle immigration cases, as police can now hold individuals longer to coordinate with ICE.

It also shows the amount of leverage states have over cities. Texas didn’t need a new law to force a change. It used funding requirements and a lawsuit to get compliance. That approach can be repeated anywhere where state money makes up a meaningful part of a city’s budget.

If other states follow this model, cities will have less room to set their own policies in areas tied to state funding. Local governments would have to weigh policy decisions against immediate financial consequences, not just legal ones. That kind of pressure can shape how cities operate well beyond immigration, since funding conditions can be applied to other issues the same way.

*Disclaimer: Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com. This is a paid advertisement for Mode Mobile’s Regulation A+ Offering.

Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.

The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.

Mode cumulative revenue includes full year revenue of businesses acquired in 2025.

Mode 2025 EBITDA includes full year EBITDA of businesses acquired in 2025