- Shortlysts
- Posts
- Head of IAEA Warns of Growing Risk of Global Nuclear Arms Race
Head of IAEA Warns of Growing Risk of Global Nuclear Arms Race
IAEA warns nuclear arms race risk is rising as more countries consider weapons, threatening global stability and weakening long-standing non-proliferation agreements.

What Happened
Rafael Grossi, head of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), warned that the world is moving toward a potential nuclear arms race as geopolitical tensions increase. In a recent interview, he described the current global system as fragile and at risk of breaking if more countries decide to pursue nuclear weapons.
Grossi pointed to renewed discussions in several nations about developing their own nuclear capabilities. Countries across Europe, Asia, and the Middle East have begun weighing their options when it comes to moving the existing non-proliferation agreements, with some reportedly considering their potential nuclear plans as a ‘friendly proliferation,’ or coordinated expansion amongst allies.
My accountant called me an idiot
When I told my accountant I put money into a $0.50 stock, he literally laughed.
"What is this, a penny stock?"
No.
It's a company with $115 million in revenue. $11.8 million in EBITDA. Profitable since April 2025. 490 million users. Ranked #1 fastest growing by Deloitte. Backed by Kevin Harrington , and sitting on a reserved Nasdaq ticker.
I sent him one link.
He called me back in 40 minutes.
"How much can I put in?"
That's the thing about this deal. Every objection dies on arrival.
"Too cheap" — it's pre-IPO, that's the whole point. "Never heard of it" — neither had anyone who bought Amazon at $18. "Sounds too good" — then read the Deloitte report yourself.
$0.50/share. Up to 20% bonus. 59,000 investors already in.*
My accountant isn't laughing anymore.
The current global nuclear balance remains heavily concentrated, as only nine countries have nuclear weapons. Of these nine, five are officially recognized as nuclear-weapon states under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT): the U.S., Russia, the U.K., France, and China.
All five are also permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. Of the remaining four, India, Pakistan, and Israel have never signed the NPT, while North Korea withdrew from the treaty in 2003.
Why It Matters
Grossi’s primary concern is not about the existing nuclear powers, but the increasing number of nations considering developing them. The more states that move forward in developing a nuclear arsenal, the greater the chance of the NPT being weakened, which has thus far been integral in limiting the spread of nuclear weapons for decades.
Countries like Poland, Japan, and South Korea are reassessing their positions as a response to the ongoing conflict with Iran, as well as the war in Ukraine. An increase in nuclear-armed states raises the complexity of deterrence and increases the chances of miscalculation.
More players on the board means more decision points, less predictability, and a much higher risk that regional conflicts could escalate beyond conventional warfare.
How It Affects You
Developments like this change the structure of global security. For the past few decades, nuclear deterrence has worked because a small number of nations have an intimate understanding of each other’s capabilities, red lines, and responses to various triggers and conflicts.
But the more countries enter the mix, especially those with different styles of governance and political systems, as well as cultural differences, the less certain the outcomes of various contingencies become. Risk becomes not just about the conflict itself, but also misreading intentions in high-pressure, fast-moving situations.
As more countries consider developing their own nuclear capabilities, this has a rippling geopolitical effect, as alliances are strengthened and new ones may be formed, with the inverse also being true. This likely leads to changing budgets over time, as more resources will be funneled into military spending as opposed to domestic spending.
In the longer term, there are valid concerns about how stable the system will remain if the proliferation expands. While the current system is predicated on limiting the total number of countries with nuclear capabilities and effectively managing the risks among them, should this limit expand, there will be more regional rivalries with nuclear implications, further complicating matters.
*Disclaimer: Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com. This is a paid advertisement for Mode Mobile’s Regulation A+ Offering.
Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.
The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.
Pro forma revenue and EBITDA, includes full year numbers of the businesses acquired throughout 2025.
Mode cumulative revenue includes full year revenue of businesses acquired in 2025.
