Gun Rights Groups Move to Dismantle Federal Weapons Law in Landmark Lawsuit

What Happened

Gun rights groups have filed a federal lawsuit aiming to take down key parts of the National Firearms Act, a law that has been in place since 1934. The case was filed in the Northern District of Texas. It is backed by the NRA Institute for Legislative Action, the American Suppressor Association, and other organizations. The lawsuit argues that the law is now unconstitutional because its original legal foundation has ceased to exist.

That foundation was a $200 tax on items like suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns. The tax was created to limit access to certain weapons without outright banning them. Earlier this year, Congress passed a measure known as the One Big Beautiful Bill. It eliminated that tax entirely. The plaintiffs say this guts the core of the NFA and turns it into a regulatory weapon without any legal basis.

Their goal is to get the courts to strike down the NFA’s remaining registration and restriction requirements for these weapons. They argue that once the tax is gone, the rest of the law can no longer be defended under the Constitution. This is particularly true under the taxing power that Congress originally used to pass it.

Why It Matters

The National Firearms Act has shaped how certain weapons are regulated for nearly a century. It requires that owners of regulated firearms go through an extensive approval process. They must register their weapons with the federal government and pay a tax. That process can take months. It applies not just to machine guns but also to relatively common items like suppressors and certain compact rifles.

Bigger than DoorDash’s $79B Explosion?

When DoorDash first hit the scene, critics brushed it off as “nothing new.”

And here’s the kicker: they were right.

Yet the founders of this "delivery business” knew something that the rest of the world missed.

Today, DoorDash is worth $79 billion, with a valuation increase of 110,800% for early investors.

But there may be a second chance with a company that recently grew 32,481%.

No, it’s not a food delivery service…

It’s a company that rests at the intersection of three fast-growing global markets, driven by the same vision of turning personal assets into income streams.*

Mode Mobile is tapping into the earning potential of smartphones, and the results speak for themselves:

● Helped users earn and save more than $325 million
● ⁠$75M+ in revenue and growing.
● #1 in software on Deloitte's 2023 fastest-growing companies list.

There are over 8 billion smartphones and Mode has gained the support of over 50,000 investors.

Their last two rounds were oversubscribed at $0.30/share and only limited room remains in the current one.  

>>> Get all the details here

Gun rights advocates have long viewed the law as outdated and overly burdensome. They argue it is disconnected from the modern legal understanding of the Second Amendment. The courts, especially the Supreme Court, have recently shown more interest in re-examining older gun laws under current constitutional standards. This lawsuit is designed to push that issue forward.

If the court sides with the plaintiffs, it could mark the end of federal registration and tracking of these weapons and accessories. That would represent one of the most significant rollbacks of federal gun control in decades. The lawsuit claims that federal restrictions are outdated and legally unsupported. Eliminating them, they argue, would streamline firearm ownership across the country.

How It Affects Readers

If the challenge succeeds, suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and other currently regulated items could become much easier to buy and own. The federal tax would be eliminated. The long application process would disappear. There would be no need to register these items with the government.

This would shift power from the federal government to the states. Many already have their own rules around these weapons. In states without restrictions, ownership could expand rapidly. Manufacturers would likely increase production. Prices could drop. What used to take months could become a same-day purchase.

Regardless of your position on gun policy, this case raises important questions. It challenges the limits of federal power and the durability of old laws under today’s constitutional standards. It also forces a re-evaluation of how government should regulate weapons that are now far more common than they were in 1934.

The case is unlikely to be resolved quickly. It could take months or even years. But it represents a direct challenge to one of the oldest federal gun laws on the books. It may reshape how firearms are regulated nationwide.

*Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.

The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.

In making an investment decision, investors must rely on their own examination of the issuer and the terms of the offering, including the merits and risks involved. Mode Mobile has filed a Form C with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its offering, a copy of which may be obtained here: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1748441/000164117225025402/ex99.pdf