Endangered Species Rules Targeted for Overhaul in Push to Ease Land Use Restrictions

What Happened

The Trump administration has proposed a new set of rule changes that would scale back key provisions of the Endangered Species Act. The proposed rules, released by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, aim to loosen restrictions on land use and industry by reshaping how species are listed and how their habitats are protected.

Key elements of the proposal include giving greater weight to economic and national security interests when designating critical habitats. It would limit the use of future threats, such as climate change, as a basis for protections. Automatic safeguards for species listed as ‘threatened’ would be removed. Instead of blanket protections, threatened species would be reviewed and regulated on a case-by-case basis.

These proposed changes would restore several regulatory frameworks that were in place during President Trump’s first term and later reversed by the Biden administration. The agencies believe this move will provide greater clarity for businesses involved in mining, energy, infrastructure, and other sectors that often interact with protected land.

Why It Matters

The Endangered Species Act, passed in 1973, has been one of the most powerful conservation tools in American law. It is credited with helping rescue iconic species like the bald eagle, gray wolf, and American alligator from extinction. It has prevented the extinction of 99% of the more than 1,700 plants and animals added to its list since its inception.

However, it has also been a frequent source of legal conflict between environmental groups and industries seeking to use land or resources on or near protected habitats.

Meet the ChatGPT of Marketing – And It's Still Just $0.81 a Share

It’s easy to see why 10,000+ investors and global giants are in on the action. Their AI software helps major brands pinpoint their perfect audience and predict what content drives action.

The proof is recurring seven-figure contracts with Fortune 1000 brands.

Think Google/Facebook-style targeting, but smarter, faster, and built for the next era of AI. Major brands across entertainment, healthcare, and gaming are already using RAD Intel, and the company has backing from Adobe and insiders from Meta, Google, and Amazon.

Here’s the kicker: RAD Intel is still private—but you can invest right now at just $0.81 per share. They’ve already reserved their Nasdaq ticker, $RADI, and the valuation has soared 4900% in just 4 years*.

This is what getting “in” early feels like. Missed Nvidia? Missed Shopify? This is your second shot. Reg A+ (or Early) shares are still available—but not for long.

👉Shares now open to investors - price changes from $0.81 on Nov 20.

Supporters of the plan will likely argue that the law has grown too rigid. They may say it has been used to block or delay critical projects for the nation’s economy. The proposed rules would strike a more practical balance between protecting wildlife and allowing for responsible development.

By allowing economic and security concerns to factor more heavily into habitat decisions, the administration hopes to speed up permitting processes and reduce the regulatory burden on industries. Supporters believe that avoiding blanket rules will allow agencies to tailor protections based on the specific needs of each species.

Opponents, however, argue that the plan will weaken the government’s ability to act quickly when species are in decline. Conservation groups believe removing automatic protections for threatened species and ignoring future risks could lead to delayed action. Species like the wolverine, monarch butterfly, and Florida manatee could face increased extinction risk.

How It Affects You

If you live in a region where mining, oil and gas, construction, or logging play a large role in the economy, these changes could mean faster project approvals and fewer roadblocks. For developers and business owners, that might translate into lower costs and more predictable timelines when working on land tied to federal conservation rules.

At the same time, communities that depend on wildlife tourism, outdoor recreation, or healthy ecosystems could feel the long-term effects of loosened protections. Species loss and habitat decline often have ripple effects that are usually negative. This can impact water quality, land stability, and regional biodiversity.

For taxpayers, the shift may lower certain federal oversight costs, but it could also create future liabilities if weakened enforcement leads to environmental damage that later requires costly mitigation.

The big fight here is philosophical. These proposals would change how the federal government weighs competing priorities. Wildlife protection would no longer be above all else but would be considered alongside energy, development, and security goals. The result is a system that is more responsive to market needs but potentially less aggressive in guarding against extinction.

*Disclaimer: This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel made pursuant to Regulation A+ offering and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The valuation is set by the Company and there is currently no public market for the Company's Common Stock. Nasdaq ticker “RADI” has been reserved by RAD Intel and any potential listing is subject to future regulatory approval and market conditions. Brand references reflect factual platform use, not endorsement. Investor references reflect factual individual or institutional participation and do not imply endorsement or sponsorship by the referenced companies. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.radintel.ai.