The Wall Street Journal reported on October 20 that Elon Musk personally ordered restrictions on the satellite communications service Ukraine uses for military operations, disrupting Ukrainian drone missions and raising new questions about how much wartime power should rest with a private technology company. The episode appears to confirm Ukraine’s longstanding fear that its dependence on SpaceX’s Starlink network creates a strategic vulnerability almost as serious as its dependence on foreign weapons and intelligence.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Mr. Musk directed that the speed at which Ukrainian equipment could remain connected to SpaceX’s network be limited. The restrictions appeared on October 14th, and particularly affected equipment mounted aboard fast-moving drones.

The incident illustrates how Ukraine’s dependence on a private internet provider has created a risk to combat operations. Ukrainian officials said connections began dropping when platforms exceeded roughly 160 kilometers per hour, interfering with both attack drones and interceptor drones designed to destroy incoming Russian weapons.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Ukraine subsequently tested Starlink equipment in European Union countries and found that terminals continued functioning above 180 kilometers per hour outside Ukraine, suggesting the Ukrainian limitation was deliberate rather than a system-wide technical problem…

If Morgan Stanley’s right, the flying car industry will grow 185,850% by 2050. In fact, they say it will reach $9 trillion in size, more than twice as valuable as today’s global car market.* 

And 5,500+ investors believe Doroni will lead the charge. While competitors chase air fleets and taxis, Doroni’s H1-X aircraft is designed for everyday life. It plugs in and charges like an EV, fits in a two-car garage, and requires just 25 hours of training to pilot. 

And while others are peddling blueprints and renderings, Doroni just unveiled a full-scale showroom prototype in March. It was so impressive, FOX Business called it the “‘flying car’ set to revolutionize air travel.”

600+ people have already reserved one, good for $240M in potential revenue for Doroni. And you can claim an early-stage stake in Doroni at $3.30/share today. But hurry. Invest in Doroni before tonight’s 11:59pm ET deadline.

The evidence increasingly suggests that Musk was involved, although the complete chain of command remains unclear. Reuters initially reported that an instruction to restrict the military-grade Starshield network had originated inside the White House, citing American and Western officials. Musk himself said Starshield was controlled by the U.S. government and that military restrictions ultimately rested with Washington. The White House denied ordering the slowdown.

The Wall Street Journal subsequently reported, citing U.S. officials and others familiar with the matter, that Musk personally authorized it. CBS News independently reported that a decision by Musk led to the restrictions and that he had discussed the issue with administration officials beforehand. On October 21, Secretary of State Marco Rubio further complicated earlier administration accounts by saying decisions about Ukraine’s access to SpaceX’s Starlink were matters for Musk and his company rather than the White House.

Reuters reported it has not independently verified every element of the Wall Street Journal’s account. Based on available evidence, it is likely that the throttling occurred, and substantial reporting indicates Musk authorized at least part of it. Exactly how Musk, SpaceX, the Pentagon, and the White House divided responsibility remains unclear.

Strategically, the incident exposes a serious Ukrainian weakness. Starlink became indispensable after Russia’s 2022 invasion because its thousands of low-orbit satellites provided resilient communications when conventional networks were destroyed or jammed. More than 40,000 terminals were already operating in Ukraine by early 2025, supporting military units as well as civilian infrastructure.

Starlink’s technological advantage comes with a dangerous concentration of power. A battlefield capability used for command, reconnaissance, logistics, and drone warfare can potentially be altered not by Ukraine’s military commanders but by decisions made thousands of miles away by a corporation, its owner or the American government. Musk had already demonstrated this leverage in 2022 when he refused a Ukrainian request to extend Starlink coverage near Crimea for an attack on Russia’s Black Sea Fleet.

For Ukraine, the lesson is that satellite communications have become strategic infrastructure comparable to ammunition or air defense. Kyiv is consequently exploring alternatives, including European satellite networks, fiber-optic communications and other providers. None, however, can immediately reproduce Starlink’s combination of coverage, bandwidth, mobility, and enormous satellite constellation.

The controversy illustrates a broader lesson of modern warfare: nations increasingly depend on privately owned technologies whose corporate owners can exercise geopolitical power once reserved almost entirely for governments.

*Disclaimer: This is a paid advertisement for Doroni Regulation A offering. Please read the offering circular at https://invest.doroni.io/