DOJ Drops the Hammer: Feds Call Out Sanctuary Cities Blocking Immigration Enforcement

What Happened

The Department of Justice has released a list of 35 sanctuary jurisdictions. This includes 12 states and 23 cities or counties that it claims are actively obstructing federal immigration enforcement.

The list comes in response to an executive order signed by President Trump earlier this year. The order directs the DOJ and the Department of Homeland Security to publicly identify local governments refusing to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

In a statement made earlier this week, Attorney General Pam Bondi said, "Sanctuary policies impede law enforcement and put American citizens at risk by design." The list includes high-profile states like California, New York, Illinois, and Colorado. It also names major cities such as New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Seattle. Several counties, including San Diego and King County, Washington, were also named.

According to the DOJ, these jurisdictions have ignored ICE detainers, refused to allow federal access to local jails, or passed laws designed to shield illegal immigrants from removal. In some cases, the department claims individuals released under sanctuary policies went on to commit violent crimes. These crimes could have been prevented with federal cooperation.

Why It Matters

This is a show of strength that the federal government is prepared to use both legal and financial pressure to break the standoff between ICE and sanctuary jurisdictions. The Trump administration sees local noncompliance not only as defiance of federal law but as a direct threat to public safety.

One of Today’s Fastest Growing Company Might Surprise You

Meet $MODE, the disruptor turning phones into income generators.*

Elon Musk said that “universal income will be necessary if AI takes over most human jobs,” and Mode is pioneering privatized UBI powered by technology. Their 3-year 32,481% revenue growth ranked them the #1 software company on Deloitte’s fastest-growing companies list in 2023.

⏰ Pre-IPO almost sold out — invest now at $0.30/share now.

Sanctuary cities have long defended their policies by arguing that local police should not act as immigration agents. They also say that trust with immigrant communities improves when enforcement is separated. But the DOJ is rejecting that justification. Instead, it frames sanctuary laws as political decisions that prioritize ideology over safety.

Bondi said the list is just the beginning. Lawsuits are expected to follow. Federal grants to law enforcement agencies in noncompliant areas could be suspended. This includes funding for programs that support policing, emergency response, and justice reform.

The administration has also directed DHS to increase ICE activity in jurisdictions on the list. It warns that if local governments will not cooperate, the federal government will escalate enforcement on its own.

How It Affects You

For Americans living in the sanctuary areas on the list, this could mean a big change in local law enforcement priorities and a surge in immigration operations. If cities and states are pressured to reverse sanctuary policies, local agencies may start honoring ICE detainers again and working more closely with federal agents.

In practical terms, that could lead to more arrests of undocumented immigrants and faster removal of individuals flagged by federal databases. It could also mean more lawsuits as city governments push back, claiming federal overreach and political targeting.

At the state level, officials will have to decide whether to risk losing federal funds or to comply with enforcement demands. That tension is likely to play out publicly, especially in places like California and Illinois, where sanctuary policies are deeply embedded in local law.

For voters, this puts immigration back on the front burner. It draws a contested line between federal authority and local control, as well as between security-focused enforcement and community-based discretion. The DOJ’s move will almost certainly be popular in red states, although it’s almost guaranteed to trigger resistance in blue ones.

The Trump administration is not keen on backing down on immigration enforcement. It seeks to restore federal authority over immigration by pressuring local governments to cooperate or face legal and financial consequences.

*Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.

The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.

Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com.