- Shortlysts
- Posts
- Diagnosing the Decline: How DEI is Reshaping America’s Med Schools
Diagnosing the Decline: How DEI is Reshaping America’s Med Schools
Medical schools are shifting from merit to ideology, prioritizing DEI and health equity over science—raising concerns about future doctors' training and patient care.

What Happened
A new report by medical watchdog group Do No Harm alleges that medical schools across the U.S. are replacing academic rigor and clinical competence with woke political ideology. According to the report, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are now central to the curriculum and institutional strategy of medical schools across the country.
The report included multiple examples of where schools have softened traditional medical stances on issues such as obesity. For example, some institutions now view calling obesity a disease as ‘stigmatizing.’
This trend is hardly isolated. Dozens of top-ranked medical schools have adopted similar frameworks that prioritize anti-racism, radical gender ideology, and 'health equity' over traditional diagnostic skill-building or scientific objectivity. Some professors have reportedly been encouraged to avoid discussing BMI (Body Mass Index) as a health metric altogether, as fears of backlash or accusations of bias are prominent.
The report warns that this cultural shift is creeping into medical licensing exams and residency programs as well.
Why It Matters
Many have legitimate concerns that DEI-driven policies are eroding the merit-based foundation of medicine. Critics argue that by sidelining measurable health data in favor of subjective social theories, medical schools are producing doctors who are far less prepared to handle the clinical demands of patient care.
As an increasing number of schools begin to value identity traits over exam performance and surgical skills, the long-standing trust in doctors as scientific experts may begin to erode. There is also concern that the message being sent to future doctors is that ideology is the ultimate guidepost as opposed to empirical evidence and a merit-based system.
For example, the redefinition of obesity is framed as a cultural problem as opposed to a clinical one. Critics argue this undermines decades of research that links it to diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. They claim this turns medicine into a social experiment, where activism supersedes diagnosis and cure.
How It Affects Readers
While the report focused on the academic angle, the ripple effects of the findings will almost certainly be felt by everyday Americans. This will affect what kind of doctor you could see in the ER, the advice you may get in a checkup, or even the decisions made about the treatment you'll receive over the short and long term.
If future physicians are being trained to downplay clear health risks to avoid offending patients, it could mean slower diagnoses, sugarcoated truths, and a growing disconnect between doctor and patient.
When ideology dictates what counts as scientific truth, the fallout goes far beyond med school. It affects healthcare outcomes, insurance policies, and the nation’s overall trust in the system. With the U.S. healthcare system already strained by rising costs and staff shortages, many argue that now is the worst possible time to dilute medical standards.
As watchdog groups continue to shine a light on these controversial practices, the elephant in the room remains. Are we training the best doctors possible, or are we just the most politically correct ones?