Conservatives Demand End to Earmarks as Budget Fight Heats Up on Capitol Hill

What Happened

A coalition of 24 conservative organizations is urging Congress to reinstate the federal ban on earmarks (spending provisions that direct taxpayer dollars to specific projects) before negotiations begin on the fiscal year 2026 budget.

Led by Advancing American Freedom, a policy group founded by former Vice President Mike Pence, the coalition sent a formal letter to congressional leaders calling earmarks ‘one of the swampiest practices in Washington.’ The letter claims that earmarks have funneled money to left-leaning initiatives, including abortion providers, transgender advocacy groups, and radical environmental organizations.

The earmark ban, originally implemented in 2011 following public backlash over wasteful spending and corruption scandals, was lifted in 2021 under a bipartisan agreement. Proponents of reinstating the ban argue that the return of earmarks has brought back the same abuse of public funds that fueled distrust in Congress over a decade ago.

The call to action comes as lawmakers face a tight timeline to pass federal funding bills for the fiscal year 2026. Appropriations deadlines are approaching quickly. Tensions over federal spending, particularly discretionary programs, are expected to rise in both chambers.

Why It Matters

Earmarks enable individual lawmakers to insert funding requests for projects in their own districts, often without broader scrutiny. While defenders argue this allows Congress to reclaim control over spending from unelected bureaucrats, critics say it invites backroom deals, encourages political favoritism, and promotes unnecessary or ideologically driven expenditures.

From garages to trillion-dollar giants… one thing never changed.

Apple started in a garage.

Amazon started in a basement.

Google started in a dorm room.

Different stories. Different products. Different acronyms.

FAANG.

MANGO.

But one constant fueled them all: DATA*

Every trillion-dollar empire runs on it.

Without data, they collapse. With it, they dominate.

Now, a new player is redefining the data model.

Mode Mobile.

Instead of Big Tech hoarding the value, Mode shares it with users by aiming to turn 7 billion smartphones into “EarnPhones.”

That’s why:

● They’ve grown 32,481% in 3 years.
● They’ve earned $75M+ in revenue.
● They’ve attracted 55,000+ investors.
● They’ve raised over $59 million
● They’ve reserved the stock ticker $MODE, paving the way for a potential IPO.

If FAANG was yesterday’s story… and MANGO is today’s headline…

Then Mode Mobile is tomorrow’s opportunity.

Their last investment round was over subscribed at $0.30/share and space in the current round is limited.

>>> Invest now before the window closes.

The letter from conservative groups is not just about spending. It reflects growing frustration with how taxpayer dollars are being allocated in an era of rising national debt and expanding federal programs. Many of the groups involved believe earmarks are being used to push social and political agendas that would never pass through the front door of national legislation.

The pressure campaign also represents an effort to hold congressional Republicans accountable as fiscal conservatives. With control of the House and a strong negotiating hand in budget talks, conservative groups are warning GOP lawmakers that failure to address earmarks will be viewed as a betrayal of limited government principles.

The letter stops short of naming individual lawmakers, but it points to a string of recent earmark-funded projects that critics say lack any clear federal purpose. Examples include funding for a California nonprofit that promotes gender identity education, a university program focused on climate justice activism, and a New York-based arts collective tied to left-wing political causes.

How It Affects You

For taxpayers, the debate over earmarks boils down to control and transparency. Reinstating the ban would mean fewer line-item spending provisions tied to individual lawmakers’ pet projects. This would effectively reduce the amount of federal money flowing into local initiatives. However, it could also tighten oversight on how public funds are spent.

Without earmarks, more funding decisions would be made at the agency level through competitive grants or formula-based allocations. That would mean fewer splashy local announcements and ribbon cuttings tied to congressional influence, but potentially more consistency in how money is distributed.

For voters, this is a question of accountability. Earmarks make it easier for lawmakers to deliver visible results in their districts, but critics argue they also allow legislators to use taxpayer money to reward allies or check political boxes. The call to end them reflects a deeper desire among conservatives to see Congress refocus on national priorities and stop using the budget as a tool for ideological spending.

As budget season intensifies, the earmark issue will serve as a litmus test for how serious Congress is about fiscal responsibility and how responsive lawmakers are to demands for a cleaner, more accountable appropriations process.

*Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.

The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.

In making an investment decision, investors must rely on their own examination of the issuer and the terms of the offering, including the merits and risks involved. Mode Mobile has filed a Form C with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its offering, a copy of which may be obtained here: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1748441/000164117225025402/ex99.pdf